News

Bacteria Hitch a Ride on Hospital Uniforms


 

FROM THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL

Some people wear their hearts on their sleeves. Doctors and nurses wear a lot more there, it seems.

Sixty percent of doctors’ hospital uniforms and 65% of nurses’ uniforms tested contained potentially pathogenic bacteria in at least one place, according to research published this month in the American Journal of Infection Control.

(c) Lars Lindblad/Fotolia.com

This study found that all the uniforms tested contained nonpathogenic common skin bacteria, and half of the samples included some sort of pathogen in addition to the nonpathogenic bacteria.

It’s not clear whether these bacteria pose an infection risk, but the authors of a study on pathogens recommended that physicians and nurses wear clean uniforms daily, improve hand hygiene practices, and use plastic aprons when performing tasks that may involve splashing or contact with body fluids.

"Wearing short-sleeved coats or even having physicians discard their white coats could further reduce the cloth-borne transmission of pathogens," reported researchers led by Dr. Yonit Wiener-Well of Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem.

They collected swab samples from three parts of the uniforms of 75 registered nurses and 60 physicians by pressing standard blood agar plates to the uniforms’ abdominal areas, sleeve ends, and pockets (Am. J. Infect. Control 2011;39:555-9).

All the uniforms tested contained nonpathogenic common skin bacteria, and half of the samples included some sort of pathogen in addition to the nonpathogenic bacteria, the researchers noted. Of the 238 total samples taken from uniforms, 14% from nurses’ gowns and 6% from physicians’ gowns contained multidrug resistant bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), the study found.

"It remains to be determined whether these bacteria can be transferred to patients and cause clinically relevant infection," the authors wrote. "The high prevalence of contaminated uniforms might be related to inadequate compliance with hand hygiene, given that the sampled sites (i.e., abdominal zone, sleeve ends, and pockets on the dominant side) are characterized by frequent hand touches."

There were no significant differences in the number of positive samples between staff from medical departments and surgical departments, the study said.

The researchers also tested four uniforms immediately after they had been cleaned by the hospital laundry, and found only common skin bacteria on those uniforms. "Bacterial loads were significantly lower than on the uniforms being worn," the investigators said.

Fifty-eight percent of those who participated in the study said they changed their uniform every day, and 77% said their attire reached a "fair to excellent" level of hygiene.

Recommended Reading

Hospital System Sends HIV Screening Soaring With EMR Prompt
MDedge Dermatology
Differentiating Dengue from Chikungunya in Returned Travelers
MDedge Dermatology
Health Workers, Gravidas Miss Flu Shot Goals
MDedge Dermatology
Many Unvaccinated Women Deny Need for HPV Vaccine
MDedge Dermatology
HPV Vaccine Coverage Lags Among Teens
MDedge Dermatology
Fluconazole-Resistant Vulvovaginitis Is Emerging
MDedge Dermatology
Commentary: Frost or Acid for Plantar Warts
MDedge Dermatology
More Preteens Get Vaccinations, But Not All They Need
MDedge Dermatology
Unusual Swine Flu Cases Have H1N1 Links
MDedge Dermatology
Phototherapy in the Treatment of Cutaneous Herpesvirus Manifestations
MDedge Dermatology