From the Cosmetic Dermatology Archives

Three Cases Comparing the Safey and Efficacy of Accent 980 Diode Laser and SmartLipo MPX

The removal of unwanted fat has been among the most popular aesthetic concerns since the advent of traditional tumescent liposuction. Recently developed energy-assisted techniques reduce downtime, improve safety, and provide better results. This study of 3 cases compares the efficacy and tolerability of 2 devices, Accent 980 Diode Laser by Alma Lasers (Accent 980) and SmartLipo MPX by Cynosure (SmartLipo MPX). Pretreatment protocols were similar in all 3 cases. No substantial adverse events were observed in any case. Equivalent results were obtained in all cases using the given treatment parameters, according to both the patient and the experienced physician administering treatment. On a 10-point scale, discomfort at day 1 after treatment was lower for Accent 980 in all 3 cases. Accent 980 can provide results equivalent to those seen with SmartLipo MPX but with less pain. Further study is warranted.


 

Recommended Reading

Immunostaining Advances Up Melanocyte ID Efficiency
MDedge Dermatology
Expert Recommends Foam Sclerotherapy for Varicose Veins
MDedge Dermatology
AAD: Lasers for Pigmentary Disorders: Yes, No, and Maybe
MDedge Dermatology
Cosmetic Industry Leading Nanotechnology Market
MDedge Dermatology
Minimally Invasive Cosmetic Surgery Continues to Rise
MDedge Dermatology
Lanolin
MDedge Dermatology
AAD: Lasers, Light Therapy Hold Promise for Onychomycosis
MDedge Dermatology
AAD: Topical Antioxidant Useful for Premature Aging of the Skin
MDedge Dermatology
Facial Rejuvenation in Skin of Color
MDedge Dermatology
Cosmetic Outcomes of Treatments for Actinic Keratoses: An Emerging Endpoint of Therapy
MDedge Dermatology