News

Liability Fears May Slow Safety System Acceptance


 

WASHINGTON — The patient safety system signed into law this summer by President Bush will likely take many months to implement; but, after operating so long in an environment of liability fear, doctors may take even longer to trust it, said Michael O. Fleming, M.D., board chair of the American Academy of Family Physicians.

"I think physicians are going to have to get comfortable with this and realize that [documenting errors under the plan] is a thing that you can do now, and it's going to improve quality tremendously," said Dr. Fleming. But, he added, it may take physicians some time to lose their reporting inhibitions.

Doctors are concerned about reporting something going wrong, because someone will be at fault and liable for that situation, he said. "In medicine, unfortunately, too many times everybody—from staff to nurses to doctors—has been afraid to report things."

Under the new law, a "patient safety work product" of reported errors and near misses is privileged and cannot be used in legal or disciplinary actions. Data collected can only be used in a criminal trial after the court makes a determination that the evidence is "material to the proceeding" and "not reasonably available from another source," according to the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005.

The structure will allow providers to voluntarily submit information to patient safety organizations certified by the Department of Health and Human Services. Patient confidentiality must be maintained. The purpose of the system is to create a searchable database of medical errors that can be analyzed and used to develop new care systems and best practices that would avoid similar errors in the future.

Dr. Fleming said the arrangement could help reveal weaknesses in medication dispensing and other systems. "This will give us an opportunity, when these errors occur, to report them without having to worry about the consequences of a liability threat," he noted.

The law became effective when the president signed it and authorizes federal funding for fiscal years 2006–2010. Implementation could begin as early as next year, said Gordon Wheeler, associate executive director for public affairs for the American College of Emergency Physicians, noting that for that to happen, the HHS "secretary's got a lot to do to set it up." HHS must coordinate databases nationwide into a single aggregated interactive resource for providers and patient safety organizations and must develop or adopt voluntary national standards to promote electronic exchange of health care information.

HHS will also certify the organizations, which were described as "new animals," by Margaret VanAmringe, vice president for public policy and government relations at the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO).

There are several possible models for patient safety organizations, she said, including U.S. Pharmacopeia's MEDMARX system. For a subscription fee, hospitals and health care systems can access MEDMARX's database to track adverse drug reactions and medication errors. Groups such as JCAHO could develop patient safety organizations, as could medical specialty organizations.

AAFP's Dr. Fleming said that while many such organizations likely would be run by systems analysts and industrial engineers, "I'm hoping there are also going to be peers. I think physicians are going to feel much more comfortable if we have peer evaluation."

Ms. VanAmringe said patient safety organizations will not only need to collect data but also aggregate and analyze those data to provide institutions with "feedback on common problems." The PSOs will develop solutions and best practices by collating data from different institutions and monitoring whether proposed interventions work. "PSOs will play a fairly robust role in using the data that are reported to them," she said.

Federal PSOs will not preempt state laws, even those with mandatory reporting systems, but VanAmringe said many state arrangements are more narrowly focused and do not provide the data analysis expected from federal PSOs. The federal program will provide standardized reporting methods, more in-depth analysis, and will potentially develop more solutions to common problems, she said.

Recommended Reading

Success of Electronic Records Lies in Planning
MDedge Dermatology
Health Care Gap Affects Patient Safety, Outcomes : Even when access is equal, there is an inequity in services provided between minority groups, others.
MDedge Dermatology
A Solution to Health Disparities: Improved Health IT
MDedge Dermatology
Physicians Are Hoping for a CMS Revision on NPI Numbers
MDedge Dermatology
Policy & Practice
MDedge Dermatology
AMA Delegates Approve Fair Prescribing Policies
MDedge Dermatology
Legal Expert Highlights Concierge-Care Risks
MDedge Dermatology
FDA Tells IOM Drug Safety Panel Changes Needed
MDedge Dermatology
Congress Negotiating Error-Reporting Measure
MDedge Dermatology
Sleep Deprived? Tips to Try for Restful Shut-Eye
MDedge Dermatology