News

S.D. voters to decide ‘any willing provider’ question; other state initiatives highlighted


 

References

Similarly, insurance companies would not be required to cover access to the investigational product.

The measure also provides protections for the physician, stating that a state regulatory authority cannot take action against a physician’s license “based solely on a physician’s recommendation to an eligible patient regarding or prescribing for or treatment with an investigational drug, biological product, or device.”

The language of the ballot measure passed the state House on March 4 and state Senate on April 15.

gtwachtman@frontlinemedcom.com

Pages

Recommended Reading

Physician income in 2013: The East earned least
MDedge Dermatology
Ergonomic solutions limit Mohs surgeons’ aches and pains
MDedge Dermatology
Managing Your Practice: What is your practice worth?
MDedge Dermatology
AMA calls on vendors, feds to improve usability of EHRs
MDedge Dermatology
Survey: Many physicians plan to reduce their workload
MDedge Dermatology
Congress poised to act on 2015 meaningful use full year reporting requirement
MDedge Dermatology
CMS website snafu could lead to penalties for meaningful users
MDedge Dermatology
Health experts push flu vaccination for patients and providers
MDedge Dermatology
Watchdog finds security lacking at healthcare.gov, two state marketplaces
MDedge Dermatology
CMS releases data on $3.5B in industry payments to doctors, teaching hospitals
MDedge Dermatology