News

CMS Seeks to End Health Plan Marketing Abuse


 

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, seeking to curtail marketing abuses within Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans, has proposed new regulations that would prohibit such tactics as door-to-door marketing and cold-calling of beneficiaries.

The proposed rules, which would incorporate into regulation several requirements that CMS already has imposed administratively, would tighten marketing standards and require independent insurance agents who sell Medicare Advantage and Part D products to be licensed by the state, the agency said.

The rules, which are subject to public comment, also seek to eliminate incentives for agents to "churn" beneficiaries, or persuade people to change plans, in order to gain enhanced commissions, said Abby Block, director of the CMS Center for Beneficiary Choices, at a press briefing.

CMS plans to roll out the final rule before the fall open enrollment season.

CMS Acting Administrator Kerry Weems noted that the proposed regulations "go beyond what the insurance industry recently endorsed as necessary regulatory changes to the program."

However, the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, which has released a report on the Medicare Advantage program, said that the proposed changes in marketing requirements "will do little to address the fundamental problems with Medicare Advantage plans."

According to Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), chairman of the committee's subcommittee on oversight and investigation, the committee's report "has verified countless stories of deceptive sales practices by insurance agents who prey on the elderly and disabled to sell them expensive and inappropriate private Medicare plans." He noted in a statement that the report "shows that steps taken by CMS will not be nearly enough to protect our most vulnerable citizens from deceptive sales practices."

The committee report recommended better sales agent training, strengthened state oversight of plan sales operations, standardization of plan benefit packages, and comprehensive tracking of beneficiary complaints.

The CMS proposal received mixed reviews from Medicare Advantage stakeholders. Karen Ignagni, president and CEO of America's Health Insurance Plans, said in a statement that the proposed regulations are "an important step to ensure beneficiaries can rely on the information being provided to make the Medicare coverage decisions that are right for them."

Robert Hayes, president of the consumer advocacy group the Medicare Rights Center, said in a statement that the proposed regulations "are inadequate to address the problems we see every day."

Specifically, the proposed plan marketing standards would prohibit cold-calling and expand the current prohibition on door-to-door solicitation to cover other unsolicited circumstances, such as sales activities at educational events like health information fairs and community meetings, or in areas such as waiting rooms where patients primarily intend to receive health care-related services, according to CMS. Any appointment with a beneficiary to market health care-related products would have to be limited to the scope that the beneficiary agreed to in advance.

The regulations also would require Medicare Advantage organizations to establish commission structures for sales agents and brokers that are level across all years and across all product types. Commission structures for prescription drug plans would have to be level across the sponsors' plans as well.

The rule also proposes new protections for beneficiaries enrolled in special needs plans (SNPs), a type of Medicare Advantage plan that provides coordinated care to individuals in certain institutions, such as nursing homes; those who are eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid; and those who have certain severe or disabling chronic conditions.

The proposed rules would require that 90% of new enrollees in SNPs be special needs individuals, would more clearly establish and clarify delivery of care standards for SNPs, and would protect beneficiaries enrolled in both Medicare and Medicaid from being billed for cost sharing that is not their responsibility.

CMS is accepting comments on the proposal until July 15.

Recommended Reading

Policy & Practice
MDedge Dermatology
Study Highlights Lack Of On-Call Specialists
MDedge Dermatology
Navigating the Insurance Maze of Biologics Tx
MDedge Dermatology
McCain's Health Plan Focuses on Tax Changes, Cost Control
MDedge Dermatology
Interdisciplinary Approach Reduces Medication Errors
MDedge Dermatology
Analysis: Quality Incentives May Backfire on Safety-Net Hospitals
MDedge Dermatology
Fairness, Documentation Protect Against Claims : Wage-hour class action lawsuits are the top legal issue that companies face in the United States.
MDedge Dermatology
'Progressive Discipline' System Provides Lawsuit Safeguard
MDedge Dermatology
Data Watch: Proposed FY 2009 Health and Human Services Budget
MDedge Dermatology
Massachusetts Plan Enrolls More of Its Uninsured
MDedge Dermatology