Practice Economics

Medicare is stingy in first year of doctor bonuses


 

References

Smaller groups and solo practitioners are even less likely to report quality to the government. “The participation rates, even though it’s mandated, are just really low,” said Dr. Alyna Chien, an assistant professor at Harvard Medical School. It’s “a level of analytics that just is not typically built into a doctor’s office.”

Dr. Lisa Bielamowicz, chief medical officer of The Advisory Board, a consulting group, predicted more doctors will start reporting their quality scores when the prospect of fines is greater. “They are not going to motivate until it is absolutely necessary,” she said. “If you look at these small practices, a lot of them just run on a shoestring.”

This year’s assessments of big groups were based on patients seen in 2013. A total of $11 million of the $1.2 billion Medicare pays doctors is being given out as bonuses, which translates to a 5% payment increase for those 14 groups getting payment increases this year. That money came from low performers and those that did not report quality measures to Medicare’s satisfaction; they are losing up to 1%.

The exact amount any of these groups lose will depend on the number and nature of the services they provide over the year. This year, 268 medical groups were exempted because at least one of their doctors was participating in one of the government’s experiments in providing care differently.

Officials at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services declined to be interviewed about the program but said in a prepared statement that they have been providing all doctors with reports showing their quality and costs. “We hope that this information will provide meaningful and actionable information to physicians so that they may improve the coordination and integration of the health care provided to beneficiaries,” the statement said.

Kaiser Health News (KHN) is a nonprofit national health policy news service. KHN’s coverage of aging and long-term-care issues is supported in part by a grant from The SCAN Foundation.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Doctors hail House vote to repeal, replace SGR
MDedge Dermatology
Senate recesses without addressing SGR repeal bill
MDedge Dermatology
Commonwealth Fund: ACA’s medical loss ratio rule saves $5 billion
MDedge Dermatology
Analysis: ACA didn’t flood physicians’ offices with new, sicker patients
MDedge Dermatology
Supreme Court won’t hear IPAB challenge
MDedge Dermatology
Supreme Court: Docs cannot sue over low Medicaid payments
MDedge Dermatology
Vaccine pioneer begins reign as acting director of the National Cancer Institute
MDedge Dermatology
SGR cuts pay by 21%; CMS to hold checks for 2 weeks
MDedge Dermatology
Uninsured made coverage gains from 2013 to 2014
MDedge Dermatology
Manage Your Dermatology Practice: Treating the More “Informed” Patient
MDedge Dermatology