Blog

To Stop or Not to Stop

Author and Disclosure Information

 

With the advent of biologic therapies, there has been debate about the necessity to stop these therapies prior to elective surgery. The concern has been that there might be an increased risk for perioperative infections in the presence of these agents. Several current guidelines of care recommend a planned break from biologic therapy in patients undergoing major surgical procedures; for example, the British Association of Dermatologists and the British Society for Rheumatology recommend stopping biologics for at least 4 half-lives before surgery.

Bakkour et al published a study online on March 2 in the Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology that audited the management of biologic therapy perioperatively in a tertiary referral psoriasis clinic against guidelines of care. In addition, they investigated the effects of continuing and stopping biologic therapy in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis patients. Information was collected on the biologics used, whether they were held perioperatively, and whether patients developed postoperative complications and/or disease flare.

The authors identified 42 patients who had a total of 77 procedures performed. Procedures included cutaneous surgery, orthopedic procedures, and cardiothoracic surgery. Biologic therapy was continued in 76% of procedures. Comparing those who continued with those who stopped biologic therapy, there was no significant difference in postoperative risk for infection and delayed wound healing. This finding included patients who underwent major surgery. Interestingly, the interruption of biologic therapy perioperatively was associated with a significant (P=.003) risk for flare of psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis.

What’s the issue?

The authors concluded that continuing biologic therapy did not increase the risk for postoperative complications. However, stopping biologic therapy perioperatively significantly increased the risk for disease flare.

Although this study was small, it shed light on an issue of great interest in the use of biologic therapy. It showed that there is a potential downside to stopping these agents before surgery. Further data are needed to fully elucidate the proper management in these cases.

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

Recommended Reading

New Systemic Therapies for Psoriasis
MDedge Dermatology
Novel Psoriasis Therapies and Patient Outcomes, Part 1: Topical Medications
MDedge Dermatology
Halting biologics before surgery tied to flares in psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis
MDedge Dermatology
Methotrexate and biologics linked to higher zoster risk in psoriasis
MDedge Dermatology
Brodalumab achieved primary endpoints for moderate to severe psoriasis at 52 weeks
MDedge Dermatology
Secukinumab beat ustekinumab for psoriasis, with difference by week four
MDedge Dermatology
No increased risk of lung disease with methotrexate
MDedge Dermatology
Traditional risk factors raise cardiovascular risk in PsA
MDedge Dermatology
Ixekizumab met psoriasis endpoints by week 12, with durable response at 60 weeks
MDedge Dermatology
Apremilast meets psoriasis endpoints at week 32
MDedge Dermatology

Related Articles

  • Clinical Review

    New Systemic Therapies for Psoriasis

    Over the last decade, expanded understanding of psoriasis pathogenesis has led to the development of new systemic agents such as biological drugs...

  • Blog

    Counting Costs

    We are all aware of the rising costs of medical care, especially for complex diseases such as psoriasis. The total cost of psoriasis in the United...