Clinical Review

Weight Loss Promotes Nonbariatric Surgery Medical Clearance

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

The majority of AEs observed in this intervention were expected and similar to other studies.10 Among the 20 participants, 18 experienced a total of 60 AEs, of which 38 (63%) were considered to be study-related. Although constipation was a known AE, 25% of participants subjectively complained of decrease in frequency of bowel movements. The 2 most frequent and unanticipated AEs were increased blood urea nitrogen/ creatinine (n = 9) and reduced sodium (n = 7).

Nonadherence was often related but not limited to the following: inappropriate social cues for eating, lack of social support, sabotage by family or peers, filling an emotional void with food, and/or psychological eating related to depression and posttraumatic stress disorder. Prior to starting a similar intervention, a complete mental health assessment for individuals with known or suspected mental health diagnoses seems warranted.

Conclusion

The study limitations are its small and predominantly male sample size and lack of a randomized control. Nonetheless, this study demonstrated the feasibility of the medically supervised weight loss program to obtain the necessary weight loss in 50% of the veterans (with higher comorbidities and more advanced age). Because of the results of this investigation, the authors have initiated a randomized controlled trial utilizing this intervention. The Optifast program had a high success rate, was cost-effective, and may obviate the need for surgery.

Acknowledgements
This work was supported by pilot funding from the Department Veterans Affairs awarded on a competitive basis to Julie Kurtz. Additional support was provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs. The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of Julie Stoneroad-Vedda, PA-C, MPAS, Northern Arizona VA Health Care System in Prescott.

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the U.S. Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Eating Disorders: Not One Size Fits All
Federal Practitioner
Effectiveness of the MOVE! Program Among African American Veterans:Weight Loss and Quality of Life
Federal Practitioner
The Risks of Opioid Treatment for Veterans, The Effect of Weight on Vasopressin Therapy, Diuretics and Cognitive Function in Elders, and more
Federal Practitioner
Women, Weight, and Gout
Federal Practitioner
The MOVE!® Program: Evidence-Based Interventions to Decrease Overweight and Obesity Translated Into Practice
Federal Practitioner
Leukocytosis After ICD Implantation; A Misleading Case of Herpes; Calculating the Risks of C difficile; Keeping Weight Off: A Losing Battle?
Federal Practitioner
Preventing Weight Loss in Patients With Dementia
Federal Practitioner
Microprocessor Knee and Power Foot Combination in a Transfemoral Amputee
Federal Practitioner
Obesity, Brain Function, and Heart Failure
Federal Practitioner
Can Neighborhoods Make People Gain Weight?
Federal Practitioner

Related Articles