Best Practices

A National WestlawNext Database Analysis of Malpractice Litigation in Radiation Oncology

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Conclusion

Litigation involving radiation oncologists were infrequent, and most verdicts were in favor of defendant radiation oncologists. Excessive radiation, unnecessary radiation, and a failure to refer and/or order appropriate tests were noted in most cases. Settlements were reached in the minority of cases, although mean payouts were more than 3 times less in these cases compared with jury verdicts. An increased awareness of radiation oncology malpractice litigation has the potential to improve physician-patient relationships and provide insight into the situations and conditions that commonly lead to litigation within the radiation oncology field.

Click here to read the digital edition.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Prevalence of Suspicious Ultrasound Features in Hot Thyroid Nodules (FULL)
AVAHO
“Unique” Challenges for Screening Native American Women
AVAHO
STAMPEDE: Radiation to prostate boosts survival of metastatic cancer
AVAHO
Gut bacteria influence HCT outcomes
AVAHO
2018: A banner year for hematology drug approvals
AVAHO
Negative colonoscopy linked with lower risk for more than 10 years
AVAHO
Poor-prognosis cancers linked to highest suicide risk in first year
AVAHO
More benefit to chemoradiation in earlier small cell lung cancer
AVAHO
A Safe Treatment Switch for Patients With Prostate Cancer
AVAHO
Obesity-related cancers increasing in younger adults
AVAHO