How can we improve diversity?
We cannot wait for, and must instead proactively recruit, diverse trainees, as well as create inclusive environments. Mentorship is key. However, recent work showing imbalances in gender of mentor-mentees and extra pressure on women mentors raises concerns about sustainability.5,6 The panel suggested that interested fellows could engage students earlier in the pipeline, participate in community awareness and exposure programs, and dedicate education time to health equity.7 Fellows raised concerns about barriers for international medical graduates, which would require institutional and federal policy changes would to implement change.
How can fellows develop better practice patterns?
Sri Komanduri, MD, focused on complex endoscopic cases.8 Having live video, using polls, and listening to other attendings comment on cases was illuminating and sometimes humbling. The panel discussed that simulation labs could strongly enhance endoscopic skill training, but if unavailable, companies are often willing to sponsor events for teaching purposes.9 If training on specific topics is not offered at an institution, regional weekend courses are also an option.
Raman Muthusamy, MD, MS, discussed his philosophy towards endoscopic complications: be prepared and follow your instinct if something feels off. He and Dr. Ikuo Hirano emphasized the importance of following up with patients after a complication. The panel also suggested that fellows can build quality improvement experience by contributing to GI morbidity and mortality conferences or start them if not already offered.
Where is the future headed?
Amrita Sethi, MD, outlined the trend towards virtual platforms and getting the global GI community involved in education efforts. She pointed out the need for a gold standard on assessing competency in endoscopy. From a practice perspective, implementation of telemedicine in GI merits further study, as so far this technology has been attractive to providers and patients alike. Todd Baron, MD, stressed that newer technologies, including artificial intelligence, will not replace the endoscopist but may reduce the need for screening procedures and instead increase demand for specific diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. He used the examples of therapeutic applications of endoscopic ultrasound and the development of single-use duodenoscopes.
Concerns about transitioning from training to independent practice
During the third-year breakout session, fellows discussed anxieties about starting practice and living up to expectations: “What if it’s my first week and there’s something I can’t do?” Faculty recommended getting to know colleagues at a new institution, being confident in your training, and staying engaged with your own complications.10 Fellows described the surprising amount of time and energy they dedicated to the job search and got counseling from Dr. Schiller, who recommended defining what “success” and “satisfaction” look like (again, defining one’s values). He recommended that, for fellows looking at private practice positions, one should ask: How much autonomy do I want? How much business risk am I willing to accept? Fellows need more formal education on practice management and the “business side” of gastroenterology.11
Conclusions
The 2021 AGA EndoscopyNow forum was unique in its discussion of issues impacting GI fellows. The forum revealed that worries about personal well-being, training quality, and future career prospects have affected fellows everywhere: you are not alone. Presentations and lively conversation between seasoned faculty who reflected on career development, education, and medical management demonstrate the importance of seeking advice from colleagues and mentorship. Based on this event, future sessions with conversations between faculty and fellows to assess needs and set priorities for directions in training would be welcome.
Dr. Liu is a gastroenterology fellow, Northwestern University, Chicago. The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
1. Katzka DA and Proctor DD. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(4):1147-8.
2. Sull D and Houlder D. Do Your Commitments Match Your Convictions? Harv Bus Rev. 2005 Jan 1. https://hbr.org/2005/01/do-your-commitments-match-your-convictions.
3. Keswani RN et al. Gastroenterology. 2020;159(1):26-9.
4. Sethi A et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(8):1673-81.
5. Rabinowitz LG et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;93(5):1047-56.e5.
6. Rabinowitz LG et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91(1):155-61.
7. Lee-Allen J, Shah BJ. Gastroenterology. 2021;160(6):1924-8.
8. Richter JM et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(3):348-52.
9. Muthusamy VR and Komanduri S. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Mar;17(4):580-3.
10. Liu H and Boyatzis RE. Front Psychol. 2021. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685829.
11. Amann ST et al. “Words” to practice by: A guide to understand the business vernacular of a healthy practice. https://webfiles.gi.org/links/pm/TheHealthOfMyPracticeToolboxPMCommitteeToolbox.pdf.
