News

Rigosertib falls short for high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes after failure on azacitidine or decitabine


 

THE LANCET ONCOLOGY

References

Rigosertib failed to extend overall survival beyond that seen with best supportive care in a trial of patients who had myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts after failure of azacitidine or decitabine treatment.

A randomized phase III trial of rigosertib (NCT 02562443) is now underway in specific subgroups of high-risk patients, including patients with very high risk on the basis of the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System criteria, to determine whether the drug may benefit specific patient subgroups, according to Dr. Guillermo Garcia-Manero of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and his colleagues.

Dr. Guillermo Garcia-Manero MD Anderson

Dr. Guillermo Garcia-Manero

The ONTIME study (NCT01241500) was an open-label, randomized controlled trial at 74 medical centers in the US and Europe. Patients with refractory anemia with excess blasts ([RAEB]-1, RAEB-2, RAEB-t, or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia) were enrolled based on local site assessment and treatment failure with a hypomethylating drug in the past 2 years.

Patients were randomly assigned on a 2:1 basis to receive rigosertib or best supportive care with or without low-dose cytarabine. Randomization was stratified by pretreatment bone marrow blast percentage. The 199 patients given rigosertib received 1,800 mg per 24 hours via a 72-hour continuous intravenous infusion administered every other week. Another 100 patients were assigned to best supportive care.

Median follow-up was 19.5 months. Median overall survival was 8.2 months (95% confidence interval, 6.1-10.1) in the rigosertib group and 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.1-9.3) in the best supportive care group (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.67-1.14; P = 0.33), the researchers reported (Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(4):496-508. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00009-7).

The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were anemia (18% of 184 patients in the rigosertib group and 8% of 91 patients in the best supportive care group), thrombocytopenia (19% vs 7%), neutropenia (17% vs. 8%), febrile neutropenia (12% vs 11%], and pneumonia (12% vs 11%). Adverse events led to death in 22% of 184 patients in the rigosertib group and 33% of 91 patients in the best supportive care group; three deaths were attributed to rigosertib treatment.

The study was funded by Onconova Therapeutics and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society.

mdales@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @maryjodales

Recommended Reading

VIDEO: High-intensity conditioning stands ground in MDS, AML
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Chemo quadruples risk for myeloid cancers
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Medicare to cover HSCT in approved clinical trials for myeloma, myelofibrosis, sickle cell disease
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
In myelodysplastic syndrome, improved tool for predicting death after HCT
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Drug exhibits preclinical activity against MDS
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Drug may best BSC in some high-risk MDS patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Germline mutations linked to hematologic malignancies
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Generic imatinib launched with savings program
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA approves generic imatinib
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Predicting transformation from MDS to AML
MDedge Hematology and Oncology