Feature

Physician groups call for CMS to drop E/M proposal


 

Another concern related to the implementation of this proposal is the financial impact on physicians.

Dr. Barbara Levy, vice president of health policy at the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Dr. Barbara Levy

Implementation of the CMS proposal, as currently written, “would be amazingly expensive for private practice [doctors] and really for anyone else because we would have to change our EMRs,” Barbara Levy, MD, cochair of the CPT/RUC Work Group at the AMA.

“We would have to reprogram our billing software. All of that comes with a significant cost,” said Dr. Levy, who also serves as vice president of health policy at the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Part of the selling point of the CMS proposal is the reduction in documentation that accompanies the E/M payment changes. The goal, according to the CMS, is to reduce time spent on paperwork and free up physicians to devote more time to patient care. But some physicians are skeptical it would work out that way.

Recommended Reading

5 HIPAA myths in the digital age
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
CMS finalizes CAR T-cell therapy inpatient payments
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Feds take baseline on EHR interoperability
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Earnings gap seen among Maryland physicians
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
The impact of tuition-free medical education
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Tuition-free med school touches off multimillion-dollar debate
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Medicare donut hole: Fewer enrollees, more spending in 2016
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
McCain’s complicated health care legacy: He hated the ACA. He also saved it
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
CAR T coverage: Drugmakers say no to patient reported outcomes
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Red flag raised on CMS indication–based formulary design policy
MDedge Hematology and Oncology