News

Agent can decrease GI toxicity in MM patients


 

Photo by Chad McNeeley

HSCT preparation

Results of a case-control study suggest a cytoprotective agent can reduce treatment-related gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

Use of this agent, amifostine, was associated with significantly lower rates of grade 2 or higher oral mucositis, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.

Additionally, amifostine did not appear to compromise the anti-myeloma activity of treatment, which consisted of high-dose melphalan (HDM) and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT).

Ehsan Malek, MD, of Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, and his colleagues reported these findings in Leukemia & Lymphoma.

The researchers compared HDM plus auto-HSCT, with or without pre-treatment amifostine, in previously treated MM patients.

There were 107 patients who received amifostine and 114 who did not. The 107 patients received amifostine at 740 mg/m2, given as a bolus infusion at 24 hours and 15 minutes before HDM.

Baseline characteristics were largely similar in the amifostine and control groups. However, more patients in the amifostine group received a tandem HSCT (17 vs 0), and more patients in the control group had an ECOG performance status of 0 (64.3% vs 43%).

Patients in the amifostine group had a longer median time from diagnosis to first HSCT—10 months (range, 4-39) vs 7 months (range, 1-95).

A majority of patients in both groups were in partial response or better at baseline. However, more patients in the control group had stable disease (6.2% vs 1%) or progressive disease (8% vs 0%).

Results

For all-grade GI toxicities, there was largely no significant difference between the amifostine and control groups. However, patients in the amifostine group had significantly lower rates of grade 2 or higher GI toxicities.

Rates of all-grade GI toxicities in the amifostine and control groups, respectively, were:

  • Oral mucositis—53.3% vs 64.0%, P=0.104
  • Nausea—90.7% vs 95.6%, P=0.143
  • Vomiting—65.4% vs 75.4%, P=0.102
  • Diarrhea—93.5% vs 84.2%,P=0.030.

Rates of grade 2 or higher GI toxicities in the amifostine and control groups, respectively, were:

  • Oral mucositis—27.1% vs 47.4%, P=0.002
  • Nausea—31.8% vs 86.0%, P<0.0001
  • Vomiting—18.7% vs 52.6%, P<0.0001
  • Diarrhea—56.1% vs 73.7%, P=0.006.

The researchers said amifostine was well tolerated and produced no significant adverse effects.

They also said amifostine had “no discernable effect” on engraftment, progression-free survival, or overall survival.

The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 11 days (range, 9-16) in the control group and 10 days (range, 6-21) in the amifostine group (P=0.011). The median time to platelet engraftment was 18 days (range, 0-26) and 19 days (range, 8-71), respectively (P<0.21).

The median progression-free survival was 40 months in the amifostine group and 32 months in the control group (P=0.012). The median overall survival was 70 months and 67 months, respectively (P=0.84).

Recommended Reading

Gene therapy moves from promise to reality
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Real-world study makes case for continuous treatment in multiple myeloma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
ASCO expands recommendations on bone-modifying agents in myeloma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Three-drug combo delivers PFS for myeloma in OPTIMISMM trial
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FIRST trial analysis shows more benefit for lenalidomide
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Drugs appear comparable for delaying SREs in MM
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Analysis reveals potential MM risk variants
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Phototherapeutic technology could fight MM, other cancers
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA clears assay for myeloma patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Treatment costs threaten cancer program growth
MDedge Hematology and Oncology