News

Treatment costs threaten cancer program growth


 

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Cancer patient receiving treatment

Treatment costs are the greatest threat to the growth of cancer programs, according to a survey of nearly 300 cancer program administrators and providers.

Sixty-eight percent of survey respondents said treatment costs were among the biggest threats to future cancer program growth at their organization.

Other top threats to growth included physician alignment around services and program goals—cited by 47% of respondents—and changes in healthcare coverage—cited by 46%.

This survey—the “2017 Trending Now in Cancer Care Survey”—was conducted by the Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) and Advisory Board’s Oncology Roundtable. It was supported by Pfizer Oncology.

The survey was distributed via email on July 24, 2017. Respondents included 293 cancer program administrators and providers from 209 institutions. They submitted responses over 6 weeks.

Respondents identified the following “biggest threats” to cancer program growth:

  • Cost of drugs and/or new treatment modalities—68%
  • Physician alignment around services and program goals—47%
  • Changes in healthcare coverage—46%
  • Cuts to fee-for-service reimbursement—44%
  • Shifting reimbursement to value-based care—43%
  • Marketplace competition—35%
  • Workforce planning (eg, managing staff shortages)—34%
  • Network strategy and integration—33%
  • Site of care policies issued by private payers—27%
  • Access to capital—26%
  • Quality reporting requirements—22%
  • Health information technology—21%
  • Other—6%.

When asked to identify their greatest opportunities for cost savings, respondents overwhelmingly pointed toward clinical standardization (63%) and drugs (62%).

Other opportunities included:

  • Supplies—28%
  • Capital expenses (eg, imaging technology)—24%
  • Non-clinical staff (eg, billing and coding specialists)—22%
  • Technology maintenance—20%
  • Clinical staff—16%
  • Retail pharmacy—14%
  • Clinical research—10%
  • Support services (eg, acupuncture)—9%
  • Other—4%.

Respondents also said the investments most likely to yield a return for their cancer program were:

  • Increasing the number of sub-specialists (eg, breast surgeons)—59%
  • Marketing—41%
  • Specialty pharmacy—36%
  • Increasing the number of general oncology physicians—34%
  • Screening services (eg, mobile screening unit)—29%
  • Capital investments—24%
  • Clinical research—16%
  • Support services—15%
  • Retail pharmacy—14%
  • Building upgrades—14%.

More details on the “2017 Trending Now in Cancer Care Survey” can be found on the ACCC website.

Recommended Reading

RELAZA2: MRD-guided azacitidine reduces relapse risk in MDS and AML
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Immunotherapy with less intense chemotherapy safe and effective for older patients with ALL
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Sotatercept promising for treatment of anemia in MDS
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
mIDH inhibitors could fill treatment gap in AML
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Technique could aid treatment of CLL
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
EC grants orphan designation to gilteritinib for AML
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Ofatumumab to be pulled from non-US markets
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Predicting response to AZA in MDS, CMML
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Bright light therapy improves sleep in cancer survivors
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
CAR T-cell therapy on fast track in US, EU
MDedge Hematology and Oncology