Clinical Edge Journal Scan

Commentary: Effects on Colorectal Cancer Treatment, June 2022

Dr Abrams scans the journals so you don't have to!

Author and Disclosure Information

 

Dr. Thomas Abrams, MD

A recent wonderful systematic review and meta-analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) studies looked specifically at predicting treatment response of survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Louise Callesen headed a group of primarily Scandinavian researchers who looked at 71 studies with a total of 6930 patients. Although the authors unsurprisingly found that the included studies consistently showed that elevated baseline ctDNA levels conferred a poor overall prognosis in terms of both progression-free survival and overall survival, they were unable to identify a role for ctDNA analysis in predicting patient response to treatment. The authors concluded that prospective clinical trials evaluating clonal evolution are needed to better tackle this question.

Next, a retrospective analysis compared adjuvant capecitabine or capecitabine + oxaliplatin (CapeOX) for resected stage II-III colorectal cancer in 606 patients. Fifty-four of these patients were taking a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) as well. The authors found that concomitant use of a PPI with capecitabine monotherapy led to shorter relapse-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.48; P = .013) compared with those not taking a PPI. Interestingly, the effect on RFS was not observed in patients receiving CapeOX. A proposed mechanism for this finding is that the increased pH in PPI-treated stomachs decreases dissolution of the capecitabine tablet. Certainly, direct observation would be required to prove this, but these data alone may be enough for oncologists to think twice before prescribing capecitabine to patients who must remain on a PPI.

Lastly, a well-done analysis from the Nurses' Health Study found that higher intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and total fructose was associated with increased incidence of and mortality from proximal colon cancer, but interestingly not distal colon or rectal cancers. The hazard ratios for both the incremental incidence of proximal colon cancer for intake of one serving of sugar-sweetened beverage per day and for 25 g/day of fructose were 1.18 (Ptrend = .02), and the hazard ratios for mortality were 1.39 ( Ptrend = .002) and 1.42 ( Ptrend = .003), respectively. I am often asked by my patients what, if any, utility there might be in limiting sugar intake when undergoing cancer treatment. This study provides the basis for an answer that is more than just hand-waving.

Recommended Reading

Can proximal serrated polyp detection rate serve as an indicator for interval post-colonoscopy CRC?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Can proximal serrated polyp detection rate serve as an indicator for interval post-colonoscopy CRC?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Evidence supporting initiation of CRC screening before 50 years of age in women
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
KRAS p.G12C mutations may have prognostic implications in mCRC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
ctDNA: Strong prognostic biomarker but lacks true clinical utility in mCRC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
ctDNA: Strong prognostic biomarker but lacks true clinical utility in mCRC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Sugar-sweetened beverage and sugar consumption tied with incidence of and mortality from proximal colon cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Case study: Managing venous thromboembolism in the cancer patient
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Immunotherapy now first line for esophageal cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Commentary: Gastric Cancer Chemotherapy in Select Populations, June 2022
MDedge Hematology and Oncology