Conference Coverage

First randomized trial reassures on ACEIs, ARBs in COVID-19


 

Protective for older patients?

The discussant of the study at the ESC Hotline session, Gianfranco Parati, MD, University of Milan-Bicocca and San Luca Hospital, Milan, congratulated Lopes and his team for conducting this important trial at such a difficult time.

He pointed out that patients in the BRACE CORONA trial were quite young (average age, 56 years) and that observational data so far suggest that ACE inhibitors and ARBs have a stronger protective effect in older COVID-19 patients.

He also noted that the percentage of patients alive and out of hospital at 30 days was higher for the patients who continued on treatment in this study (95% vs. 91.8%), which suggested an advantage in maintaining the medication.

Dr. Lopes replied that one-quarter of the population in the BRACE CORONA trial was older than 65 years, which he said was a “reasonable number.”

“Subgroup analysis by age did not show a significant interaction, but the effect of continuing treatment does seem to be more favorable in older patients and also in those who were sicker and had more comorbidities,” he added.

Dr. Parati also suggested that it would have been difficult to discern differences between ACE inhibitors and ARBs in the BRACE CORONA trial, because so few patents were taking ACE inhibitors; the follow-up period of 30 days was relatively short, inasmuch as these drugs may have long-term effects; and it would have been difficult to show differences in the main outcomes used in the study – mortality and time out of hospital – in these patients with mild to moderate disease.

Franz H. Messerli, MD, and Christoph Gräni, MD, University of Bern (Switzerland), said in a joint statement: “The BRACE CORONA trial provides answers to what we know from retrospective studies: if you have already COVID, don’t stop renin-angiotensin system blocker medication.”

But they added that the study does not answer the question about the risk/benefit of ACE inhibitors or ARBs with regard to possible enhanced viral entry through the ACE2 receptor. “What about all those on these drugs who are not infected with COVID? Do they need to stop them? We simply don’t know yet,” they said.

Dr. Messerli and Dr. Gräni added that they would like to see a study that compared patients before SARS-CoV-2 infection who were without hypertension, patients with hypertension who were taking ACE inhibitors or ARBs, and patients with hypertension taking other antihypertensive drugs.

The BRACE CORONA trial was sponsored by D’Or Institute for Research and Education and the Brazilian Clinical Research Institute. Dr. Lopes has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

A version of this article originally appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

COVID-19: U.S. cardiology groups reaffirm continued use of RAAS-active drugs
MDedge Infectious Disease
COVID-19 cases highlight longstanding racial disparities in health care
MDedge Infectious Disease
Evidence suggests possible RAS-blocker benefit in COVID-19 patients
MDedge Infectious Disease
ACEI/ARBs linked with survival in hypertensive, Chinese COVID-19 patients
MDedge Infectious Disease
Angiotensin drugs and COVID-19: More reassuring data
MDedge Infectious Disease
New angiotensin studies in COVID-19 give more reassurance
MDedge Infectious Disease
ACE inhibitors and severe COVID-19: Protective in older patients?
MDedge Infectious Disease
Today’s top news highlights: Addressing racism in maternity care, group forms to protect health professionals from retaliation
MDedge Infectious Disease
Holistic HIV care broadens scope to noncommunicable diseases
MDedge Infectious Disease
Cleaner data confirm severe COVID-19 link to diabetes, hypertension
MDedge Infectious Disease