Conference Coverage

Depression, hypertension combo compounds cardiovascular risk


 

AT THE ESC CONGRESS 2015

References

LONDON – The combination of depression and very high systolic blood pressure increased the risk for a major cardiovascular event by 83%, compared with normal blood pressure and no depression, in patients with existing heart disease, diabetes, or stroke.

In a large family practice–based study, the hazard ratio for first hospital admission due to myocardial infarction, stroke or heart failure, or cardiovascular death in patients with high (at least 160 mm Hg) systolic blood pressure who were also depressed was 1.83, a highly significant difference compared with individuals with normal BP and no depression.

Dr. Bhautesh Jani

Dr. Bhautesh Jani

The presence of depression also significantly increased the risk for these cardiovascular events by 36% in patients with lower systolic BPs, compared with those with normal BP and no depression.

“Patients with existing heart disease, diabetes, or stroke are more likely to have another heart attack or another stroke or die from heart problems than the general population,” Dr. Bhautesh Jani of the Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow (Scotland), said at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.

“In particular, those who have extremes of blood pressure or those who have depressive symptoms are at higher risk, which has been shown by previous evidence. What is relatively unknown is the combined effect of having extremes of blood pressure and depressive symptoms together, and our study tried to address that problem,” Dr. Jani explained.

The study involved more than 35,500 individuals with existing heart disease, diabetes, or stroke living in Scotland, of whom 3,939 (11%) had at least one major cardiovascular event that needed hospital admission during a 4-year period. Patients had been divided into groups based on their systolic BP, and depressive symptoms were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) during 2008-2009. A HADS score of more than 7 was considered indicative of depression.

Dr. Jani noted that all the results were adjusted for multiple confounding factors, including age, gender, socioeconomic status, number of comorbid conditions, total cholesterol values, body mass index, and the initiation of antidepressant medication.

“The key implications I would suggest are for secondary prevention and to perhaps focus our resources on monitoring blood pressure and providing treatment in patients with associated depressive symptoms,” Dr. Jani proposed.

Dr. Christi Deaton, professor of clinical nursing research at the University of Cambridge (England), who commented on the study findings, noted that it highlighted the importance of raising awareness among both clinicians and patients of the potential risk associated with a combination of hypertension and depression, particularly among patients with a high level of other risk factors for further cardiovascular events.

“Screening patients for depression is very simple to do and you can start with a couple of questions asking about whether or not the patient felt sad or had low mood, and then go on to use other screening tools,” she observed. “All providers should be screening patients and thinking about the synergy of these two risk factors,” she said.

Dr. Salim Hayek

Dr. Salim Hayek

Other research presented at the ESC Congress by cardiologist Dr. Salim Hayek of Emory University in Atlanta also highlighted the importance of screening for depression, this time in patients with angina. In a study of 5,202 adults enrolled in the university’s biobank between 2004 and 2013 and who underwent left heart catheterization, patients with frequent chest pain were found to have more depressive symptoms than those without angina. Depressive symptoms in this study were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).

“Chest pain was more frequent in patients with mild depression with and without coronary artery disease, regardless of sex or history of myocardial infarction,” Dr. Hayek said. After multivariate analysis, depression was the most important predictor of frequent chest pain, he added. Other factors independently associated with chest pain frequency were female sex, coronary artery disease severity, history of MI, body mass index, and high blood lipid levels.

“At follow-up, a decrease in depressive symptoms was associated with improvement in chest pain,” Dr. Hayek said, but patients with depression who were revascularized did not show an improvement in chest pain.

The findings suggest that the association between chest pain and depression was independent of the underlying arterial disease and further studies are needed to look at the effect of revascularization and angina relief on depressive symptoms, and conversely if antidepressant medications could help alleviate chest pain.

The study Dr. Jani presented was funded by the Scottish Government. Dr. Jani and Dr. Hayek both reported having no disclosures.

This article was updated February 3, 2016.

Recommended Reading

ESC: Alirocumab ‘cures’ heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia
MDedge Internal Medicine
ESC: New support for aspirin’s anticancer effect
MDedge Internal Medicine
PsA confers higher risk of cardiovascular disease, events
MDedge Internal Medicine
Psoriasis severity correlates with aortic vascular inflammation
MDedge Internal Medicine
TCT: Absorb BVS meets pivotal U.S. noninferiority goal
MDedge Internal Medicine
TCT: FFR-CT improved costs, quality of life in PLATFORM trial
MDedge Internal Medicine
TCT: Ranolazine fails to block angina after incomplete revascularization
MDedge Internal Medicine
TCT: No difference at 2 years between Absorb BVS and XIENCE
MDedge Internal Medicine
TCT: CTO treatment after MI doesn’t benefit LV function
MDedge Internal Medicine
EADV: Latest gruesome twosome: Psoriasis spawns renal disease
MDedge Internal Medicine