News

PREPARE Trial Shows How to Safely Cut Back on ICD Shocks


 

DENVER — Implantable cardioverter defibrillators can be programmed to safely eliminate three-quarters of unnecessary shocks in patients with a primary prevention indication for the device, according to a study presented at the annual scientific sessions of the Heart Rhythm Society.

The Primary Prevention Parameters Evaluation (PREPARE) was a prospective, nonrandomized, 38-center study involving 700 primary prevention patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Their single-chamber, dual-chamber, or biventricular ICDs were programmed to disregard supraventricular tachycardias and slow or nonsustained ventricular tachycardias (VTs) while aggressively expanding preferential use of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) to painlessly terminate fast VTs before resorting to maximum-energy shocks.

The 691 historic controls drawn from two major clinical trials were primary prevention ICD patients for whom VT/VF (ventricular fibrillation) detection and treatment programming wasn't controlled, explained Dr. Bruce L. Wilkoff, lead investigator and director of cardiac pacing and tachyarrhythmia devices at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation.

The primary end point in PREPARE was the morbidity index, a composite of all spontaneous arrhythmias treated with shocks, instances of arrhythmic syncope, and untreated sustained symptomatic VT/VF episodes. During the first year of follow-up, the morbidity index was 0.18 events per patient-year in the PREPARE cohort and 0.69 events per patient-year in controls, for a highly significant 74% relative risk reduction. Of patients in the PREPARE cohort, 8% received a shock in the first year, compared with 18% of controls. Nine cases of arrhythmic syncope occurred in eight patients, with no injuries.

One-year mortality was 4.8% in the PREPARE group and 8.7% in controls, a difference that was nonsignificant in a multivariate analysis that controlled for potential confounders.

“I wasn't surprised to see we could reduce shocks. I was very pleased to see that there really was no big tradeoff” in terms of morbidity due to untreated arrhythmias, the electrophysiologist said.

Noting that most ICDs are implanted for primary prevention indications, Dr. Wilkoff said that “most of our ICD patients receive far too many shocks. … To me, every tachycardia terminated by ATP is a success, and those would all be inappropriate shocks [with conventional programming]. I can't see a reason not to do” the PREPARE programming, he added.

PREPARE programming included utilization of the ICD's built-in supraventricular tachycardia discrimination feature and detection of only those rhythms of at least 182 beats per minute and a duration of at least 30 of 40 ventricular beats. Pacing with ATP was programmed for episodes with a rate of 182–250 beats per minute, with a shock reserved for arrhythmias over 250 beats per minute and episodes not terminated by ATP.

Session cochair Dr. Hein J. Wellens called PREPARE “very impressive.”

“The patient will be much happier with this approach. The other important point is that delaying shocks if you have a rapid VT apparently does not result in deterioration to VF. So there are all sorts of positive findings,” observed Dr. Wellens, professor emeritus of cardiology at Maastricht (the Netherlands) University. He speculated that the observed mortality trend favoring PREPARE ICD programming might achieve significance with longer follow-up.

Dr. Wilkoff agreed that the data raise the possibility that inappropriate shocks for nonsustained arrhythmias might cause injury that promotes mortality. “It's a very intriguing idea, but this is not the study to prove that point,” he said.

Heart Rhythm Society president Dr. Dwight W. Reynolds said in an interview that PREPARE has the potential for a large impact on practice. Some ICD physicians haven't been using ATP at all in primary prevention, and others have used it only for episodes with a maximum rate of 220 beats per minute.

“It's fairly strong encouragement to be much more aggressive with the ATP in the primary prevention setting,” said Dr. Reynolds, professor of medicine and chief of the cardiovascular section at the University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City.

Dr. Wilkoff is a consultant to Medtronic, which sponsored PREPARE.

'Most of our ICD patients receive far too many shocks.' DR. WILKOFF

ELSEVIER GLOBAL MEDICAL NEWS

Recommended Reading

Endovascular Beats Open Surgical Repair for AAA
MDedge Internal Medicine
Preventive Antibiotics Out for Most Heart Patients
MDedge Internal Medicine
Regular Toothbrushing Causes Bacteremia Involving Pathogens Related to Endocarditis
MDedge Internal Medicine
Pre-PCI Atorvastatin Reduces Cardiac Events
MDedge Internal Medicine
Low-Dose Aspirin as Effective and Safer Than High-Dose After PCI
MDedge Internal Medicine
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Linked to Risk Of Atrial Fibrillation Before Age 65
MDedge Internal Medicine
Adult-Onset Asthma Boosts Women's Cardiovascular Risk
MDedge Internal Medicine
FDA Panel Backs Avalide as First-Line HT Therapy
MDedge Internal Medicine
Depression Tied to Worse Heart Failure Outcomes
MDedge Internal Medicine
Analysis Ties Rosiglitazone to Increased MI Risk
MDedge Internal Medicine