Law & Medicine

The evolving role of expert testimony


 

Dr. Tan is emeritus professor of medicine and former adjunct professor of law at the University of Hawaii, Honolulu. This article is meant to be educational and does not constitute medical, ethical, or legal advice. For additional information, readers may contact the author at siang@hawaii.edu.

References

1. Internal Medicine News, “Expert medical testimony,” Sept. 9, 2010; “Qualifying as an expert,” Jan. 2, 2015; “Dispensing with expert testimony,” April 19, 2016.

2. Armacost v. Davis, 175 A.3d 150 (Ct. App. Md, 2017).

3. Shallow v. Follwell, (No. ED103811, Mo. App., Eastern Dist., Div. 4, 2017).

4. Henry TA, “Is it OK to have 4-to-1 expert ratio in medical liability case?” AMA Wire, June 22, 2018.

5. Mitchell v. Shikora, 161 A.3d 970 (Pa. Super. 2017).

Pages

Recommended Reading

Ranked: State of the states’ health care
MDedge Internal Medicine
Compounded topicals flagged on fears of Medicare fraud, risk
MDedge Internal Medicine
Doctors decry inaction on physician-focused APMs
MDedge Internal Medicine
CMS pushes ACOs to take on more risk
MDedge Internal Medicine
Docs push back on step therapy in Medicare Advantage
MDedge Internal Medicine
Employment practices liability insurance
MDedge Internal Medicine
Creating positive patient experiences
MDedge Internal Medicine
5 HIPAA myths in the digital age
MDedge Internal Medicine
Feds take baseline on EHR interoperability
MDedge Internal Medicine
Earnings gap seen among Maryland physicians
MDedge Internal Medicine