News

Asymptomatic Neurocognitive Impairment Quantified in HIV-Positive Patients

View on the News

ANI Testing Not Ready for Prime Time

It has been controversial as to whether ANI is a real construct or not, meaning is it just a construct that we are making by neuropsychological performance testing or is it really something that has meaning and consequence.

Neurocognitive decline in this patient population is probably a multifactorial process, with HIV contributing along with other factors that could push a person further in the progression of his or her disease.

The study had an underlying assumption that ANI would progress. But, in reality, that doesn’t always happen. People can fluctuate back and forth, so long-term analysis of these individuals is very important for us. Some individuals may stay in an ANI state and never progress. Being able to distinguish those who will progress – which researchers are starting to try to pull out – from those who will not progress will be helpful because it will allow evaluation of clinic populations and selection for treatment.

Even if ANI is identified, options for intervention are limited. There are no neuroprotective agents, so this study would suggest that ANI is an important feature and that we should start earlier in our treatment to address neuroprotective strategies. However, these efforts have not yet been translated to either a clinical or research environment.

Generally, undertaking the neurocognitive testing used in the study is not feasible. The tests require a neuropsychologist and a couple of hours of testing. In our clinic, we are always trying to find that kind of person to do testing, but we have limited time to see a patient, and it’s very hard for us to administer all of these tests.

Dr. Beau Ances was the session co-moderator at the meeting. He is in the department of neurology at the Washington University in St. Louis. He disclosed being on the advisory committee for Eli Lilly and working on an antidementia drug trial for Pfizer.


 

FROM THE CONFERENCE ON RETROVIRUSES AND OPPORTUNISTIC INFECTIONS

SEATTLE – HIV-positive patients who have asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment may require especially close follow-up because of a sharply elevated risk of progression to symptomatic disease, according to an analysis from the CHARTER longitudinal cohort study.

At baseline, 35% of the 347 patients studied had neurocognitive impairments on testing but did not have any self-reported or observed declines in everyday functioning, and were thus classified as having asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI).

After a median follow-up of nearly 4 years, these patients had a 2.2- to 5.3-fold higher risk of developing symptomatic HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder relative to their counterparts who were neurocognitively normal, Dr. Igor Grant reported at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections.

"The CHARTER study suggests that people with ANI do tend to progress to symptomatic status more frequently than people who don’t have any cognitive impairment," he commented. "ANI could be a harbinger for some underlying process that is worthy of monitoring."

In additional findings, certain other groups of patients defined by sociodemographic and HIV-related factors – women, substance abusers, and those with lower nadir CD4 counts, for example – also had an elevated risk of progression to the point of having symptoms.

Session attendee Dr. Lewis Haddow from the University College London wondered about the blinding of patients to their impairment on testing. "Could those with a label of ANI perhaps have overreported things on the self-report scale and subsequent follow-up?" he asked.

"They were not told their results, so those with ANI would not know it," replied Dr. Grant, who is professor and executive vice chair of the department of psychiatry at the University of California, San Diego.

Giving some study background, he noted that frank dementia in HIV-positive patients is uncommon today with effective antiretroviral therapy, but milder forms of impairment are still observed. "There has been concern among investigators as to whether particularly this entity of asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment, A, is real; and B, has clinical significance or any kind of predictive validity," he commented.

The CHARTER study was a multicenter study among HIV-positive patients receiving care in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Every 6 months, a patient subset was assessed with a comprehensive battery of neurocognitive and other tests.

Symptomatic neurocognitive disorder was ascertained from self-report (requiring impairments on both the Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory and Activities of Daily Living) and performance (requiring impairment on the Medication Management Test–Revised or on the Valpar System 3000 Work Samples and Computerized Assessment).

On average, the patients were about 43 years old and had been HIV positive for roughly a decade. Approximately 70% were on antiretroviral therapy; 82% were male, and 46% were white. With a median follow-up of 45 months, 32% developed symptomatic neurocognitive disorder.

After adjustment for education, estimated verbal IQ, and comorbidity classification, patients with ANI had an increased risk of symptomatic neurocognitive disorder based on self-report only (relative risk, 2.2; P = .005) and performance only (RR, 5.3, P less than .0001).

Certain baseline sociodemographic factors including age, female gender, low levels of education, and the presence of comorbidity as well as certain HIV-related factors including low nadir CD4 count and presence of AIDS also predicted decline to symptomatic status.

The investigators have not yet looked at the predictive performance of individual measures of neurocognitive function, according to Dr. Grant, who disclosed no relevant conflicts of interest. Also, they have not assessed virologic suppression as a predictor, but being on antiretroviral therapy did not predict decline to symptomatic neurocognitive disorder.

Recommended Reading

Study Suggests New Potential Alzheimer’s Treatment Strategy
MDedge Internal Medicine
Haloperidol Doubles Risk of Death in Institutionalized Elderly
MDedge Internal Medicine
Scan That Predicts Alzheimer's Creates Moral Dilemma
MDedge Internal Medicine
Continuing Donepezil Appears Best for Some Alzheimer's Patients
MDedge Internal Medicine
Asymptomatic Carotid Disease Impairs Cognitive Function
MDedge Internal Medicine
Pain Medications Relieve Agitation in Demented Patients
MDedge Internal Medicine
Monitoring Antipsychotic Side Effects Infrequent Among Dementia Patients
MDedge Internal Medicine
Delirium Due to Medical Cause Often Misdiagnosed as Psychiatric Disorder
MDedge Internal Medicine
Single Question Flags Depression in Chronic Pain
MDedge Internal Medicine
Diabetes Managed More Tightly in Demented Patients
MDedge Internal Medicine