Feature

CMS targets ‘spread pricing’ to help lower drug costs


 

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is clarifying how Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) managed care plans calculate the medical loss ratio in a effort to reign in drug costs.

A pillbox spilling capsules wrapped in paper money Dynamic Graphics/Thinkstockphotos.com

The medical loss ratio is set at 85%, meaning that managed care plans can spend only 15% of revenue on administrative costs and profits, with 85% being used for beneficiary care, including paying for claims, expenditures for activities that improve health care quality, and fraud prevention activities.

But CMS officials said they are concerned that managed care plans are not properly accounting for “spread pricing” in their medical loss ratio calculations. Spread pricing occurs when pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) keep a portion of money paid by the managed care plan instead of passing the payment to the pharmacy for filling the prescription on behalf of the beneficiary.

“If spread pricing is not appropriately monitored and accounted for, a PBM can profit from charging health plans an excess amount above the amount paid to the pharmacy dispensing a drug, which increases Medicaid costs for taxpayers,” the agency said in a statement issued May 15 in conjunction with new guidance on calculating the medical loss ratio to account for spread pricing.

Regulations require Medicaid and CHIP managed care plans to exclude drug rebates from actual claims costs used to calculate the medical loss ratio. The new guidance clarifies the definition of a drug rebate to include “any price concession or discount received by the managed care plan or its PBM, regardless of who pays the rebate or discount,” the agency said. “Therefore, the amount retained by the PBM under spread pricing would have to be excluded from the amount of claims costs used for calculating the managed care plan’s [medical loss ratio].”

CMS added that the reason for this is that spread pricing “should not be used to artificially inflate a Medicaid or CHIP managed care plan’s [medical loss ratio].”

Recommended Reading

U.S. measles cases nearing postelimination-era high
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Report: Part B funds stable, hospital trust running out
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Navigating the Oncology Care Model
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Pretrial screening panels: Do they reduce frivolous claims?
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
CMS proposes payment increase for administering CAR T in the hospital
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Consider varying generational needs, preferences in the workplace and with patients
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
CBO predicts more Medicare spending with drug rebate proposal
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Survey: High costs lead to skipped or postponed health care
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Pilot program trains residents in telemedicine
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Medicare withdraws plans to exclude drugs from Part D protected classes
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management