Original Research

Impact of Hospitalist Programs on Perceived Care Quality, Interprofessional Collaboration, and Communication: Lessons from Implementation of 3 Hospital Medicine Programs in Canada

Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management. 2021 May;28(3):122-133 | 10.12788/jcom.0047

References

1. Yousefi V, Wilton D. Re-designing Hospital Care: Learning from the Experience of Hospital Medicine in Canada. Journal of Global Health Care Systems. 2011;1(3).

2. White HL. Assessing the Prevalence, Penetration and Performance of Hospital Physicians in Ontario: Implications for the Quality and Efficiency of Inpatient Care. Doctoral Thesis; 2016.

3. Yousefi V, Chong CA. Does implementation of a hospitalist program in a Canadian community hospital improve measures of quality of care and utilization? An observational comparative analysis of hospitalists vs. traditional care providers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:204.

4. Yousefi V, Hejazi S, Lam A. Impact of Hospitalists on Care Outcomes in a Large Integrated Health System in British Columbia. Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management. 2020;27(2):59-72.

5. Salim SA, Elmaraezy A, Pamarthy A, et al. Impact of hospitalists on the efficiency of inpatient care and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2019;9(2):121-134.

6. Peterson MC. A systematic review of outcomes and quality measures in adult patients cared for by hospitalists vs nonhospitalists. Mayo Clinic Proc. 2009;84(3):248-254.

7. Webster F, Bremner S, Jackson M, et al. The impact of a hospitalist on role boundaries in an orthopedic environment. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2012;5:249-256.

8. Gotlib Conn L, Reeves S, Dainty K, et al. Interprofessional communication with hospitalist and consultant physicians in general internal medicine: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012; 12:437.

9. About Fraser Health. Fraser Health Authority. Updated 2018. Accessed January 30, 2019. https://www.fraserhealth.ca/about-us/about-fraser-health#.XFJrl9JKiUk

10. Divisions of Family Practice. Accessed May 2, 2020. https://www.divisionsbc.ca/provincial/about-us

11. Patton MQ. Essentials of Utilization-Focused Evaluation. 2012. Sage Publications, Inc; 2011.

12. Buljac-Samardzic M, Doekhie KD, van Wijngaarden JDH. Interventions to improve team effectiveness within health care: a systematic review of the past decade. Hum Resour Health. 2020;18(1):2.

13. Verhaegh KJ, Seller-Boersma A, Simons R, et al. An exploratory study of healthcare professionals’ perceptions of interprofessional communication and collaboration. J Interprof Care. 2017;31(3):397-400.

14. O’Leary KJ, Johnson JK, Manojlovich M, et al. Redesigning systems to improve teamwork and quality for hospitalized patients (RESET): study protocol evaluating the effect of mentored implementation to redesign clinical microsystems. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):293.

15. Stein J, Payne C, Methvin A, et al. Reorganizing a hospital ward as an accountable care unit. J Hosp Med. 2015;10(1):36-40.

16. Yousefi V. How Canadian hospitalists spend their time - A work-sampling study within a hospital medicine program in Ontario. Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management. 2011;18(4):159.

17. Marinella MA: Hospitalists-Where They Came from, Who They Are, and What They Do. Hosp Physician. 2002;38(5):32-36.

18. Wachter RM. An introduction to the hospitalist model. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(4 Pt 2):338-342.

19. Wachter RM, Goldman L. The hospitalist movement 5 years later. JAMA. 2002;287(4):487-494.

20. van Walraven C. The Influence of Inpatient Physician Continuity on Hospital Discharge. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(9):1709-1714.

21. Goodwin JS, Li S, Kuo YF. Association of the Work Schedules of Hospitalists With Patient Outcomes of Hospitalization. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(2):215-222.

22. Nichani S, Fitterman N, Lukela M, Crocker J, the Society of Hospital Medicine, Patient Handoff. 2017 Hospital Medicine Revised Core Competencies. J Hosp Med. 2017;4:S74.

23. Lo HY, Mullan PC, Lye C, et al. A QI initiative: implementing a patient handoff checklist for pediatric hospitalist attendings. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016;5(1):u212920.w5661.

24. Wachter RM, Goldman L. Zero to 50,000 - The 20th Anniversary of the Hospitalist. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(11):1009-1011.

25. Grimm, P. Social Desirability Bias. In: Sheth J, Malhotra N, eds. Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010.

We also asked the survey respondents to assess the impact of the new hospitalist model on different dimensions of care quality, including patient satisfaction, patient experience, efficiency, and overall quality of care (Figure 6). Findings were comparable across these dimensions, with roughly 50-60% of respondents noting positive changes compared to before the implementation of the programs. However, most interviewees identified both positive and negative effects in these areas. Positive impacts included hospitalist on-site presence leading to better accessibility and timeliness of care (n = 5), hospitalists providing continuity to patients/families by working for weeklong rotations (n = 6), hospitalists being particularly skilled at managing complex clinical presentations (n = 2), and hospitalists being able to spend more time with patients (n = 2). On the other hand, some interviewees noted that patients and families did not like seeing multiple doctors due to frequent handoffs between hospitalists (n = 12). They also raised concerns that hospitalists did not know patients’ histories or had relationships with them, potentially leading to longer length of stay and unnecessary investigations (n = 8).

Site-to-site ratings of satisfaction and performance

Survey respondents’ satisfaction and performance ratings varied substantially site-to-site. Across all areas assessed, ratings were consistently highest at Site B (the smallest institution in our evaluation and the most recent addition to the HM network in the health authority). These differences were statistically significant across all survey questions asked.

Discussion

Findings from this study provide insight into the experiences of frontline health care professionals and administrators with the implementation of new HM services across a range of small to large acute care facilities. They indicate that the majority of respondents reported high levels of satisfaction with their hospitalist services. Most also indicated that the service had resulted in improvements compared to prior inpatient care models.

Over half of the survey respondents, and the majority of interviewees, reported a positive impact on interprofessional communication and collaboration. This was largely attributed to enhanced accessibility and availability of hospitalists:

"Being on-site lends itself to better communication because they’re accessible. Hospitalists always answer the phone, but the general practitioners (GP) don’t always since they may be with other patients." (Dietician, Site A)
"A big strength is that we have physician presence on the unit all day during scheduled hours, which makes us more accessible to nurses and more able to follow up on patients that we have concerns about." (Physician Leader, Site B)

However, the ratings dropped substantially when they were asked to assess adherence to specific best practices of such communication and collaboration, such as participation in daily check-ins or attendance at team care rounds (Figure 3). Interdisciplinary clinical rounds have been identified as a tool to improve the effectiveness of care teams.¹² A number of elements have been identified as key components of effective rounds.¹³ Bedside rounds have also been found to enhance communication and teamwork.^14,15 In our study, the discrepancy between overall high levels of satisfaction with hospitalists’ communication/collaboration despite low scores on participation in more concrete activities may illustrate the importance of informal and ad hoc opportunities for interactions between hospitalists and other care providers that result from the enhanced presence of hospitalists on care units.⁸ Outside of formal rounds, hospitalists have the ability to interact with other care providers throughout their shifts. Prior studies have shown that hospitalists spend a significant portion of their time communicating with other care team members throughout their workdays.¹⁶ At the same time, the amount of time spent on communication should be balanced against the need for provision of direct care at the bedside. Future research should aim to identify the right balance between these competing priorities, and to understand the nature and quality of the communication between various care providers.