Original Research

Impact of Hospitalist Programs on Perceived Care Quality, Interprofessional Collaboration, and Communication: Lessons from Implementation of 3 Hospital Medicine Programs in Canada


 

References

As mentioned above, hospitalist performance ratings varied substantially from site-to-site and were consistently higher at Site B (a small community hospital in a semi-rural area), followed by Site C (a medium-sized community hospital) and Site A (a tertiary referral center). The variability in program ratings and perceived hospitalist impacts between sites could be due to a variety of factors, such as the degree of change between the past and current models at each site, differences in hospitalist hiring processes, hospital size and culture, and differences in service design and operations. It may also be related to the timing of the introduction of the HM service, as Site B was the most recent site where the service was established. As such, there may be an element of recall bias behind the observed discrepancies. This highlights the importance of local context on respondent perceptions and suggests that our results may not be generalizable to other institutions with different attributes and characteristics.

Conclusion

Findings from this study have demonstrated that the recent hospitalist services in our health system have improved overall levels of interprofessional communication and teamwork, as well as perceptions of care quality among the majority of participants who reported high levels of satisfaction with their programs. Our findings further highlight the issue of frequent handovers among hospitalists as a pressing and ongoing challenge.

Corresponding Author: Vandad Yousefi, MD, CCFP, Past Regional Department Head – Hospital Medicine, Fraser Health Authority, Central City Tower, Suite 400, 13450 – 102nd Ave, Surrey, BC V3T 0H1; vandad.yousefi@fraserhealth.ca.

Financial disclosures: This project was funded by the Fraser Health Authority, which provided the funding for hiring of the external consultant to design, implement, and analyze the results of the evaluation program in collaboration with the Regional Hospitalist Program at Fraser Health.

Pages

Recommended Reading

A Multi-Membership Approach for Attributing Patient-Level Outcomes to Providers in an Inpatient Setting
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
A Preoperative Transthoracic Echocardiography Protocol to Reduce Time to Hip Fracture Surgery
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab Improves Outcomes in Previously Untreated Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
“Thank You for Not Letting Me Crash and Burn”: The Imperative of Quality Physician Onboarding to Foster Job Satisfaction, Strengthen Workplace Culture, and Advance the Quadruple Aim
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
An Analysis of the Involvement and Attitudes of Resident Physicians in Reporting Errors in Patient Care
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
COVID-19 Monoclonal Antibody Infusions: A Multidisciplinary Initiative to Operationalize EUA Novel Treatment Options
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Use of Fecal Immunochemical Testing in Acute Patient Care in a Safety Net Hospital System
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Implementing the AMI READMITS Risk Assessment Score to Increase Referrals Among Patients With Type I Myocardial Infarction
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Implementation of a Symptom–Triggered Protocol for Severe Alcohol Withdrawal Treatment in a Medical Step-down Unit
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
A Service Evaluation of Acute Neurological Patients Managed on Clinically Inappropriate Wards
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management