Clinical Review

2018 Update on minimally invasive gynecologic surgery

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

The energy devices used to perform the hysterotomy and enucleation are selected largely based on surgeon preference, but various instruments can be used to accomplish these steps, including an ultrasonically activated scalpel or such electrosurgical instruments as monopolar scissors or hooks.

A reliable tenaculum is critical to the success of any enucleation, whether the approach is conventional LM or RALM, in order to provide adequate traction on the myoma (FIGURE 4). We try to minimize the number of hysterotomy incisions not only to reduce further blood loss, as the majority of bleeding ensues from the surrounding myometrium, but also to minimize compromise of myometrial integrity. Additionally, we take care to avoid entry into the endometrial cavity.

As we enucleate a myoma, we place it in either the anterior or posterior cul de sac. Most important, if we enucleate multiple myomas, we keep careful track of their number. We string the myomas together with suture until we extract them to ensure this.

While hysterotomy closure can be performed with either barbed or nonbarbed sutures in a single- or a multi-layered fashion, we prefer to use a barbed suture.29,30 Just as enucleation requires appropriate instruments, suturing requires proper needle drivers (FIGURE 5). We advise judicious use of energy to minimize thermal effects and maintain the viability of the surrounding myometrium. Once we have sutured the myometrium closed, we place an adhesion barrier.

Although discussion of tissue extraction is beyond the scope of this Update, any surgeon embarking on either conventional LM or RALM must have a strategy for safe contained tissue extraction given the recent concerns over uncontained power morcellation.31,32

Surgical skill and careful patient selection are key to optimal outcomes

Patients seeking conservative surgical management of their uterine fibroids should be considered candidates for either a conventional LM or RALM. Both the scientific literature and technologic advances make these approaches viable options, especially when the surgeon’s skill is appropriate and the patient’s candidacy is adequately vetted. A well thought out surgical strategy from start to finish will ensure the chances for successful completion and optimized outcomes.

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@mdedge.com. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Hysteroscopic myomectomy using a mechanical approach
MDedge ObGyn
What is the risk that a patient will have an occult uterine cancer at myomectomy?
MDedge ObGyn
Is the use of a containment bag at minimally invasive hysterectomy or myomectomy effective at reducing tissue spillage?
MDedge ObGyn
Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy
MDedge ObGyn
7 Myomectomy myths debunked
MDedge ObGyn
Abdominal myomectomy: Patient and surgical technique considerations
MDedge ObGyn
Laparoscopic myomectomy: Tips for patient selection and technique
MDedge ObGyn
Laparoscopic myomectomy technique
MDedge ObGyn
Myomectomy of a large cervical fibroid in a patient desiring future fertility
MDedge ObGyn
VTE risk after gynecologic surgery lower with laparoscopic procedures
MDedge ObGyn