From the Editor

What is the most effective management of first trimester miscarriage?

Author and Disclosure Information

A Cochrane network meta-analysis reported that both uterine aspiration and medication management are more effective than expectant management for the treatment of miscarriage. The summary statistics from the meta-analysis may be helpful for patient counseling.


 

References

First trimester miscarriage, the presence of a nonviable intrauterine pregnancy before 13 weeks’ gestation, is a common complication occurring in approximately 15% of clinical pregnancies.1,2 The goals for the holistic management of first-trimester miscarriage are to 1) reduce the risk of complications such as excessive bleeding and infection, 2) ensure that the patient is supported during a time of great distress, and 3) optimally counsel the patient about treatment options and elicit the patient’s preferences for care.3 To resolve a miscarriage, the intrauterine pregnancy tissue must be expelled, restoring normal reproductive function.

The options for the management of a nonviable intrauterine pregnancy include expectant management, medication treatment with mifepristone plus misoprostol or misoprostol-alone, or uterine aspiration. In the absence of uterine hemorrhage, infection, or another severe complication of miscarriage, the patient’s preferences should guide the choice of treatment. Many patients with miscarriage prioritize avoiding medical interventions and may prefer expectant management. A patient who prefers rapid and reliable completion of the pregnancy loss process may prefer uterine aspiration. If the patient prefers to avoid uterine aspiration but desires control over the time and location of the expulsion process, medication treatment may be optimal. Many other factors influence a patient’s choice of miscarriage treatment, including balancing work and childcare issues and the ease of scheduling a uterine aspiration. In counseling patients about the options for miscarriage treatment it is helpful to know the success rate of each treatment option.4 This editorial reviews miscarriage treatment outcomes as summarized in a recent Cochrane network meta-analysis.5

Uterine aspiration versus mifepristone-misoprostol

In 2 clinical trials that included 899 patients with miscarriage, successful treatment with uterine aspira-tion versus mifepristone-misoprostolwas reported in 95% and 66% of cases, respectively.6,7

In the largest clinical trial comparing uterine aspiration to mifepristone-misoprostol, 801 patients with first-trimester miscarriage were randomly assigned to uterine aspiration or mifepristone-misoprostol.6 Uterine aspiration and mifepristone-misoprostol were associated with successful miscarriage treatment in 95% and 64% of cases, respectively. In the uterine aspiration group, a second uterine aspiration occurred in 5% of patients. Two patients in the uterine aspiration group needed a third uterine aspiration to resolve the miscarriage. In the mifepristone-misoprostol group, 36% of patients had a uterine aspiration. It should be noted that the trial protocol guided patients having a medication abortion to uterine aspiration if expulsion of miscarriage tissue had not occurred within 8 hours of receiving misoprostol. If the trial protocol permitted 1 to 4 weeks of monitoring after mifepristone-misoprostol treatment, the success rate with medication treatment would be greater. Six to 8 weeks following miscarriage treatment, patient-reported anxiety and depression symptoms were similar in both groups.6

Uterine aspiration versus misoprostol

Among 3 clinical trials that limited enrollment to patients with missed miscarriage, involving 308 patients, the success rates for uterine aspiration and misoprostol treatment was 95% and 62%, respectively.5

In a study sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, 652 patients with missed miscarriage or incomplete miscarriage were randomly assigned in a 1:3 ratioto uterine aspiration or misoprostol treatment (800 µg vaginally). After 8 days of follow-up, successful treatment rates among the patients treated with uterine evacuation or misoprostol was 97% and 84%, respectively.8 Of note, with misoprostol treatment the success rate increased from day 3 to day 8 of follow-up—from 71% to 84%.8

Continue to: Mifepristone-misoprostol versus misoprostol...

Pages

Recommended Reading

2023 Update on fertility
MDedge ObGyn
Cesarean deliveries drop in women at low risk
MDedge ObGyn
Infant and maternal weight gain together amplify obesity risk
MDedge ObGyn
COVID-19 in pregnancy affects growth in child’s first year of life
MDedge ObGyn
Routine third-trimester ultrasounds can detect likely breech births
MDedge ObGyn
Oophorectomies continue to dominate torsion treatment
MDedge ObGyn
Study: Prenatal supplements fail to meet nutrient needs
MDedge ObGyn
Adherence to oral contraceptive protocols prevents pregnancy
MDedge ObGyn
Vaginal microbiome does not affect infant gut microbiome
MDedge ObGyn
Misoprostol only for abortion: Viable option but not ‘the best’
MDedge ObGyn