Pearls

How you can aid your patient’s claim for long-term disability

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Neuropsychiatric disorders are associated with high rates of impaired work capacity despite the best efforts of treating clinicians to help their patients stay employed or resume working after symptoms improve.1

In the past, a note from the psychiatrist stating that the patient was unable to work because of a neuropsychiatric condition often was sufficient to approve a disability claim. This is no longer the case in today’s more restrictive climate, and what constitutes prima facie evidence of a patient’s inability to sustain competitive employment secondary to neuropsychiatric illness has significantly changed.

The following practices can help facilitate approval of your patient’s disability claim.

Document as you go. Progress notes should include the type, frequency, context, duration, and severity of symptoms supporting ≥1 psychiatric diagnoses which prevent your patient from holding a job. It also is important to document the parameters of treatment and the patient’s response, including compliance with treatment recommendations. Preferably, progress notes should include quantitative ratings over time that pertain to everyday functioning, highlighting how your patient is coping with the psychosocial, cognitive, and executive functioning demands of his (her) job.

When documented over time, ratings based on the Global Assessment of Functioning scale or a comparable scale are useful in quantifying the nature and degree of impaired functioning related to work capacity. Consider administering rating scales at periodic intervals to show changes over time. When feasible, scales should be based on a patient’s and informant’s report of symptomatic status and everyday functioning, and could include use of instruments such as the World Health Organization’s Disability Assessment Schedule.2,3

Include documentation specific to work capacity. Disability claims often are denied, in part, because the treating psychiatrist’s judgment regarding work capacity seems to “come out of the blue,” appears premature, or lacks discussion of the functional implications of the patient’s clinical status in regards to recent or current job expectations. Therefore, progress notes should include reference to long-standing, emerging, or worsening behaviors or symptoms that have clear implications for your patient’s ability to work.

Outline the functional implications of the patient’s preserved and impaired abilities and skills as they relate to work capacity, vocational history, and recent or current job situation. For example, work requirements that are highly dependent on interaction with the public, supervisors, or coworkers would be significantly affected by recurrent or persistent psychosis, even if the patient adheres to treatment and symptoms are relatively mild. Problems with working memory or anterograde memory could impair work that routinely involves learning and retention of new instructions and procedures.

Pages

Recommended Reading

VIDEO: Medical apps will disrupt health care in a good way
MDedge Psychiatry
AUDIO: New NIMH director discusses future of depression therapy
MDedge Psychiatry
EHR woes will get worse before they get better: ONC chief
MDedge Psychiatry
Battle continues over NIMH’s mandate as new director steps in
MDedge Psychiatry
Legislators: Investigate Medicare fraud before paying doctors
MDedge Psychiatry
VIDEO: When is it time to jump into MACRA with both feet?
MDedge Psychiatry
Feds require more transparent reporting of clinical trial results
MDedge Psychiatry
The choice in November could not be more important
MDedge Psychiatry
Changes in DSM-5 codes in ICD-10 go into effect Oct. 1
MDedge Psychiatry
GAO report calls out HHS for misdirecting ACA reinsurance funds
MDedge Psychiatry