Medicolegal Issues

‘3 Strikes ‘n’ yer out’: Dismissing no-show patients

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Dear Dr. Mossman,
The clinic where I work initiated a “3 misses and out” policy: If a patient doesn’t show for 3 appointments in a 12-month period, the clinic removes him from the patient rolls. I’ve heard such policies are common, but I worry: Is this abandonment?
Submitted by “Dr. C”

The short answer to Dr. C’s question is, “Handled properly, it’s not abandonment.” But if this response really was satisfactory, Dr. C probably would not have asked the question. Dealing with no-show patients has bothered psychiatrists, other mental health professionals, and other physicians for decades.1

Clinicians worry when patients miss important follow-up, and unreimbursed office time won’t help pay a clinician’s salary or office expenses.2 But a policy such as the one Dr. C describes may not be the best response—clinically or financially—for many patients who miss appointments repeatedly.

If no-show patients worry you or cause problems where you practice, read on as I cover:

  • charging for missed appointments
  • why patients miss appointments
  • evidence-based methods to improve show-up rates
  • when ending a treatment relationship unilaterally is not abandonment
  • how to dismiss no-show patients from a practice properly.

The traditional response: Charging for no-shows

Before the mid-1980s, most office-based psychiatrists worked in solo or small group and required patients to pay cash for treatment; approximately 40% of psychiatrists still practice this way.3 Often, private practice clinicians require payment for appointments missed without 24 hours’ notice. This well-accepted practice2,4,5 reinforces the notion that psychotherapy involves making a commitment to work on problems. It also protects clinicians’ financial interests and mitigates possible resentment that might arise if office time committed to a patient went unreimbursed.6 Clinicians who charge for missed appointments should inform patients of this at the beginning of treatment, explaining clearly that the patient—not the insurer—will be paying for unused treatment time.2,4

Since the 1980s, outpatient psychiatrists have increasingly worked in public agencies or other organizational practice settings7 where patients—whose care is funded by public monies or third-party payors—cannot afford to pay for missed appointments. If you work in a clinic such as the one where Dr. C provides services, you probably are paid an hourly wage whether your patients show up or not. To pay you and remain solvent, your clinic must find ways other than charging patients to address and reduce no-shows.

Why patients miss appointments

The literature abounds with research on why no-shows occur. But no-shows seem to be more common in psychiatry than in other medical specialties.8 The frequency of no-shows varies considerably, but it’s a big problem in some mental health treatment contexts, with reported rates ranging from 12% to 60%.9 A recent, comprehensive review reported that approximately 30% of patients refuse, drop out, or prematurely disengage from services after first-episode psychosis.10 No-shows and drop outs are linked to clinical deterioration11 and heightened risk of hospitalization.12

A recent study from Scotland suggests that, in general practice, a small fraction of patients account for a large proportion of no-shows.13 Studies of psychiatric outpatient care find that a variety of factors are associated with no-shows, including clinical and demographic characteristics of patients, referral and practice patterns, and patients’ attitudes and beliefs about treatment (Table 18,14).

Jaeschke et al15 suggests that no-shows, dropping out of treatment, and other forms of what doctors call “noncompliance” or “nonadherence” might be better conceptualized as a lack of “concordance,” “mutuality,” or “shared ideology” about what ails patients and the role of their physicians. For this reason, striving for a “partnership between a physician and a patient,” with the patient “fully engaged in the two-way communication with a doctor … seems to be a much more suitable way of achieving therapeutic progress in the discipline of psychiatry.”15

Pages

Recommended Reading

Do you have to MIPS in 2017? CMS has a tool for that
MDedge Psychiatry
One-third of drug postmarket studies go unpublished
MDedge Psychiatry
Digital transference: New dangers in a new world
MDedge Psychiatry
Republicans race the clock on health care, but the calendar is not helping
MDedge Psychiatry
Trump presidency prompts Goldwater Rule debate at APA
MDedge Psychiatry
Physician-created APMs: Early recommendations offer insight
MDedge Psychiatry
More telemedicine shifts to system-wide models
MDedge Psychiatry
Trump administration loosens up HealthCare.gov
MDedge Psychiatry
President’s budget: Malpractice reform but deep health care cuts
MDedge Psychiatry
Health reform action shifts to Senate, exacerbated by poor AHCA CBO score
MDedge Psychiatry