Evidence-Based Reviews

Urine drug tests: How to make the most of them

Current Psychiatry. 2019 August;18(8):10-18,20

References

1. Passik SD, Schreiber J, Kirsh KL, et al. A chart review of the ordering and documentation of urine toxicology screens in a cancer center: do they influence patient management? J Pain Symptom Manag. 2000;19(1):40-44.
2. Arthur JA, Edwards T, Lu Z, et al. Frequency, predictors, and outcomes of urine drug testing among patients with advanced cancer on chronic opioid therapy at an outpatient supportive care clinic. Cancer. 2016;122(23):3732-3739.
3. Suzuki JM, Garayalde SM, Dodoo MM, et al. Psychiatry residents’ and fellows’ confidence and knowledge in interpreting urine drug testing results related to opioids. Subst Abus. 2018;39(4):518-521.
4. Reisfield GM, Bertholf R, Barkin RL, et al. Urine drug test interpretation: what do physicians know? J Opioid Manag. 2007;3(2):80-86.
5. Kirsh KL, Baxter LE, Rzetelny A, et al. A survey of ASAM members’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices in urine drug testing. J Addict Med. 2015;9(5):399-404.
6. Morasco BJ, Krebs EE, Adams MH, et al. Clinician response to aberrant urine drug test results of patients prescribed opioid therapy for chronic pain. Clin J Pain. 2019;35(1):1-6.
7. Liu RH. Comparison of common immunoassay kits for effective application in workplace drug urinalysis. Forensic Sci Rev. 1994;6(1):19-57.
8. Jannetto PJ, Fitzgerald RL. Effective use of mass spectrometry in the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem. 2016;62(1):92-98.
9. American Society of Addiction Medicine. Resources: ASAM releases white paper on drug testing. https://www.asam.org/resources/publications/magazine/read/article/2013/12/16/asam-releases-white-paper-on-drug-testing. Published December 16, 2019. Accessed June 25, 2019.
10. Fishbain DA, Cutler RB, Rosomoff HL, et al. Validity of self-reported drug use in chronic pain patients. Clin J Pain. 1999;15(3):184-191.
11. Michna E, Jamison RN, Pham LD, et al. Urine toxicology screening among chronic pain patients on opioid therapy: Frequency and predictability of abnormal findings. Clin J Pain. 2007;23(2):173-179.
12. Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain--United States, 2016. JAMA. 2016;315(15):1624-1645.
13. Chou R. 2009 clinical guidelines from the American Pain Society and the American Academy of Pain medicine on the use of chronic opioid therapy in chronic noncancer pain: what are the key messages for clinical practice? Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2009;119(7-8):469-477.
14. Mihic SJ, Harris RA. Hypnotics and sedatives. In: Brunton LL, Chabner BA, Knollmann BC, eds. Goodman & Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 13th ed. New York, NY: McGrawHill Medical; 2017:343-344.
15. DePriest AZ, Puet BL, Holt AC, et al. Metabolism and disposition of prescription opioids: a review. Forensic Sci Rev. 2015;27(2):115-145.
16. Tenore PL. Advanced urine toxicology testing. J Addict Dis. 2010;29(4):436-448.
17. Brahm NC, Yeager LL, Fox MD, et al. Commonly prescribed medications and potential false-positive urine drug screens. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2010;67(16):1344-1350.
18. Saitman A, Park HD, Fitzgerald RL. False-positive interferences of common urine drug screen immunoassays: a review. J Anal Toxicol. 2014;38(7):387-396.
19. Moeller KE, Kissack JC, Atayee RS, et al. Clinical interpretation of urine drug tests: what clinicians need to know about urine drug screens. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92(5):774-796.
20. Nelson ZJ, Stellpflug SJ, Engebretsen KM. What can a urine drug screening immunoassay really tell us? J Pharm Pract. 2016;29(5):516-526.
21. Reisfield GM, Goldberger BA, Bertholf RL. ‘False-positive’ and ‘false-negative’ test results in clinical urine drug testing. Bioanalysis. 2009;1(5):937-952.
22. Poklis A, Moore KA. Response of EMIT amphetamine immunoassays to urinary desoxyephedrine following Vicks inhaler use. Ther Drug Monit. 1995;17(1):89-94.
23. ElSohly MA, Feng S, Murphy TP, et al. Identification and quantitation of 11-nor-delta9-tetrahydrocannabivarin-9-carboxylic acid, a major metabolite of delta9-tetrahydrocannabivarin. J Anal Toxicol. 2001;25(6):476-480.
24. Selavka CM. Poppy seed ingestion as a contributing factor to opiate-positive urinalysis results: the pacific perspective. J Forensic Sci. 1991;36(3):685-696.
25. Jaffee WB, Trucco E, Levy S, et al. Is this urine really negative? A systematic review of tampering methods in urine drug screening and testing. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007;33(1):33-42.
26. Fraser AD, Worth D. Urinary excretion profiles of 11-nor-9-carboxy-delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol: a delta9-thccooh to creatinine ratio study. J Anal Toxicol. 1999;23(6):531-534.
27. Holt SR, Donroe JH, Cavallo DA, et al. Addressing discordant quantitative urine buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine levels: case examples in opioid use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;186:171-174.
28. Accurso AJ, Lee JD, McNeely J. High prevalence of urine tampering in an office-based opioid treatment practice detected by evaluating the norbuprenorphine to buprenorphine ratio. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017;83:62-67.

Factors that can affect UDT results

In addition to knowing when to order UDT, it is critical to know how to interpret the results of UDS and follow up with confirmatory tests when needed. Other than the limitations of the tests, the following factors could contribute to unexpected UDT results:

the drug itself, including its half-life, metabolic pathways, and potential interactions with other medications
how patients take their medications, including dose, frequency, and pattern of drug use
all the medications that patients are taking, including prescription, over-the-counter, and herbal and supplemental preparations
when the last dose of a prescribed controlled substance was taken. Always ask when the patient’s last dose was taken before you consider ordering a UDT.

To help better understand UDT results, Figure 1¹⁴ and Figure 2¹⁵ demonstrate metabolic pathways of commonly used benzodiazepines and opioids, respectively. There are several comprehensive reviews on commonly seen false positives and negatives for each drug or each class of drugs in immunoassays.^16-21Confirmatory tests are usually very accurate. However, chiral analysis is needed to differentiate enantiomers, such as methamphetamine (active R-enantiomer) and selegiline, which is metabolized into L-methamphetamine (inactive S-enantiomer).²² In addition, detection of tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV), an ingredient of the cannabis plant, via GC/MS can be used to distinguish between consumption of dronabinol and natural cannabis products.²³ The Table^16-21summarizes the prototype agents, other detectable agents in the same class, and false positives and negatives in immunoassays.

Interpreting UDT results and management strategies

Our Algorithm outlines how to interpret UDT results, and management strategies to consider based on whether the results are as expected or unexpected, with a few key caveats as described below.

Expected results

If there are no concerns based on the patient’s clinical presentation or collateral information, simply continue the current treatment. However, for patients taking medications that are undetectable by UDS (for example, regular use of clonazepam or oxycodone), consider ordering confirmatory tests at least once to ensure compliance, even when UDS results are negative.

Unexpected positive results, including the presence of illicit drugs and/or unprescribed licit drugs

Drug misuse, abuse, or dependence. The first step is to talk with the patient, who may acknowledge drug misuse, abuse, or dependence. Next, consider modifying the treatment plan; this may include more frequent monitoring and visits, limiting or discontinuing prescribed controlled substances, or referring the patient to inpatient or outpatient SUD treatment, as appropriate.

Continue to: Interference from medications or diet