From the Journals

Emotional processing of scenes in bipolar I appears intact

New findings contradict previous studies on processing of faces in bipolar


 

FROM THE JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH

Differences in self-reported and EEG-measured responses to emotional scenes between patients with bipolar I disorder with and without a history of psychosis, and healthy controls are negligible, results of a cross-sectional study suggest.

“While prior research supports abnormalities in the emotional face response, this study suggests these neural and behavior differences do not fully generalize to scenes, indicating that nonsocial emotional responding may be intact in these patients,” reported Rebekah L. Trotti and colleagues.

The investigators conducted a multisite study among 130 participants with bipolar and a history of psychosis, 75 with bipolar and no history of psychosis, and 181 healthy controls. Although the investigators had hypothesized that, in keeping with findings from face-processing studies, emotional responses would be reduced in patients with bipolar I disorder, they found no differences on EEG in early posterior negativity and only small differences for late positive potential between the groups. The groups were presented with the same 60 scenes that were unpleasant, neutral, or pleasant. The study was published in the Journal of Psychiatric Research.

Participants rated each scene according to the Self-Assessment Manikin after the respective EEG readings were taken. No significant statistical differences were seen on these ratings between groups, reported Ms. Trotti, a graduate student in the behavioral and brain sciences program at the University of Georgia, Athens, and colleagues.

The investigators also assessed whether participants had psychosis and looked at medications they were taking. However, those analyses also showed no statistically significant differences between participants with bipolar I and a history of psychosis, those with bipolar and no history of psychosis, and healthy controls in the processing of emotional scenes. Ms. Trotti and colleagues noted that other ways of differentiating subtypes in this heterogeneous disorder, such as those based on biomarkers and brain structure rather than those laid out by the DSM, might yield the differences in neural activity they had expected.

“Future research on this topic should focus on neurocognitive subtypes of mood and psychotic disorders, as well as other domains of emotional responding and behavior,” Ms. Trotti and colleagues wrote.

SOURCE: Trotti RL et al. J Psychiatr Res. 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.10.005.

Recommended Reading

The challenges of caring for a physician with a mental illness
MDedge Psychiatry
Premature mortality across most psychiatric disorders
MDedge Psychiatry
The 84-year-old state boxing champ: Bipolar disorder, or something else?
MDedge Psychiatry
Distinct mood, apathy profiles found in bipolar disorder patients
MDedge Psychiatry
Lithium drug interactions not quite as bad as imagined
MDedge Psychiatry
Regional brain activation lower in bipolar disorder patients after multiple manic episodes
MDedge Psychiatry
#MomsNeedToKnow mental health awareness campaign set to launch
MDedge Psychiatry
Increased Parkinson’s disease risk seen with bipolar disorder
MDedge Psychiatry
Bipolar disorder or borderline personality disorder?
MDedge Psychiatry
Should psychiatrists prescribe nonpsychotropic medications?
MDedge Psychiatry