News

Low Literacy Limits Label Comprehension


 

WASHINGTON – Patients who read at or below the 6th-grade level had a low level of comprehension of instructions on the labels of five commonly used medications, according to a study led by Terry Davis, Ph.D., of the Louisiana State University.

Even though labels seem short and to the point, “many patients need more specific, concrete information,” including instructions on exactly what time of day to take a medication, Dr. Davis said in presenting the findings at a conference on health literacy sponsored by the American College of Physicians.

Along with colleagues at Northwestern University, the University of North Carolina, Western Michigan Area Health Education Center, and Emory University, she queried 395 patients at three clinics that primarily serve the indigent about their understanding of labels for the following drugs: amoxicillin for pediatric use, trimethoprim, guaifenesin, felodipine, and furosemide (Ann. Intern. Med. 2006;145:887–94).

The goal was to determine whether primary care patients could read and correctly state how to take medicines after reading the labels on actual pill bottles, Dr. Davis said. The researchers hypothesized that patients with low literacy were more likely to misunderstand instructions. They also believed that the increasing number of medications taken by Americans is leading to growing confusion and medication errors.

Participants spoke English as a primary language and were not hearing or vision impaired. Half were African American and half were white. The mean age was 45 years, and 29% had a less than high school education. Literacy was assessed with the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) test. Of the 395 patients, 19% (75) were deemed to have low literacy, reading at or below a 6th-grade level, and 29% (114) had marginal literacy, reading at the 7th- to 8th-grade level.

All patients were asked how they would take the medicine. A “correct” answer was given if they included all aspects of the label instruction, including dosage, timing, and duration. Overall, 47% (185) of patients misunderstood at least one of the instructions. For marginal literacy patients, 51% (201) misunderstood one or more instructions, and for low literacy patients, 63% (249) misunderstood.

The majority–91%, or 359 patients–understood the felodipine instructions, which were, “Take one tablet by mouth once each day.” The lowest level of comprehension was for trimethoprim, which had a label instructing to “take one tablet by mouth twice daily for seven days.”

Higher literacy patients routinely understood instructions better than those with lower literacy, Dr. Davis said. The adjusted odds ratio of misunderstanding for low literacy was 2.32, and for marginal literacy, 1.94. Most misunderstandings had to do with dosage. For instance, patients commonly believed they should give children a tablespoon instead of a teaspoon of amoxicillin.

Patients who took more medications were also more likely to misunderstand labels, with the adjusted relative risk rising from 2.29 for 1–2 medications to 2.98 for 5 or more medications.

Study limitations included the fact that the authors only examined understanding of the primary label. They did not assess patients' actual compliance or drug-taking behavior, whether medication errors occurred, or if any of the patients had experience with any of the five medications.

In an editorial accompanying Dr. Davis' study (Ann. Intern. Med. 2006;145:926–8), Dr. Dean Schillinger wrote that the authors did not fully prove out their conclusion that low literacy is correlated with poor comprehension because they did not “account for patients' cognitive function or visual acuity–each of which can impair reading comprehension and could explain poor understanding of labels.”

But, he added, that “does not weaken the conclusion that many patients do not comprehend prescription labels and cannot act on their instructions.”

In fact, misunderstanding among patients at a typical internal medicine practice might be higher because patients are likely to be older, take more medications and have less English proficiency than those in the study, said Dr. Schillinger, of the University of California, San Francisco.

He said the study should prod physicians to routinely ask patients if they understand what medications they have been prescribed and how to correctly take them.

Recommended Reading

Two Part D Plans Relax Rules on AD Drugs
MDedge Psychiatry
Agency in U.K. Keeps Limits on Alzheimer's Rx
MDedge Psychiatry
Sideline Docs Among Teams' Key 'Players'
MDedge Psychiatry
Medical Schools Just Say No to Drug Reps' Gifts
MDedge Psychiatry
Policy & Practice
MDedge Psychiatry
Opinions Vary Widely on Financial Disclosures
MDedge Psychiatry
New JCAHO Safety Goal: Identify Suicide Risks
MDedge Psychiatry
Survey Addresses Location, Practice Patterns of Pain Specialists
MDedge Psychiatry
Palliative Care to Be Recognized as Subspecialty : Physicians in psychiatry and other specialties may be able to take certification examination by 2008.
MDedge Psychiatry
Facial Photo Capture Could Prevent Errors
MDedge Psychiatry