Evidence-Based Reviews

Anticonvulsants for alcohol withdrawal: A review of the evidence

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Conclusion: The researchers concluded that physical symptoms disappeared quicker in the sodium valproate group than in the control group.20

Hillbom et al21 evaluated the efficacy of sodium valproate vs carbamazepine vs placebo to prevent alcohol withdrawal seizures. A total of 138 participants were studied. Forty-three were assigned to the carbamazepine group, 46 to the sodium valproate group, and 49 to the placebo group. The RCT lasted 4 days. The initial medication doses were 1,200 mg/d. Participants in the carbamazepine group experienced more adverse effects than those in the sodium valproate or placebo groups (P < .001). As a result, approximately one-half of the participants in the carbamazepine group stopped taking the medication. This finding was dependent on the dose of carbamazepine; >800 mg/d resulted in poor tolerance to adverse effects. Seizures occurred among patients in all 3 arms of the study; in the sodium valproate group, 1 participant had a seizure vs 2 participants in the carbamazepine group and 3 in the placebo group. On the other hand, DT occurred only in the sodium valproate and placebo groups.

Conclusion: Researchers concluded that when using sodium valproate or carbamazepine to prevent alcohol withdrawal seizures in an outpatient setting, the adverse effects may outweigh the benefits.21

Lamotrigine

The characteristics of the lamotrigine study included in this review are summarized in Table 3.22

Djokić et al22 evaluated the efficiency of lamotrigine in the treatment of DT. A total of 240 participants who met International Classification of Diseases-10 criteria for DT were randomized to a control group that was treated with anticonvulsants according to an NIAAA protocol (2004), or to an experimental group that was treated with lamotrigine. The CIWA-Ar and the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) were administered for objective assessment of clinical symptoms, superimposed medical complications, general condition of the patient, adverse effects, and mortality rate. Statistically significant differences between the experimental and control groups were apparent after the third day of therapy, when a drop in the average CIWA-Ar score was observed in the experimental group, while the control group still had high scores (P < .01). After the fifth day of treatment, the differences in scores were more apparent, with the experimental group showing CIWA-Ar scores equal to those of persons with mild/moderate DT, while those in the control group still had high scores. After the tenth day, participants in the experimental group did not have any alcohol withdrawal symptoms, while control group participants were just beginning to get out of life-threatening danger. Death occurred in 4.1% of control group participants and 3.4% of experimental group participants; this difference in mortality rate was not statistically significant.

Continue to: Conclusion

Pages

Recommended Reading

Pharmacotherapy for alcohol use disorder in patients with hepatic impairment
MDedge Psychiatry
Reducing COVID-19 opioid deaths
MDedge Psychiatry
Heavy drinking by teens may affect white-matter integrity
MDedge Psychiatry
Polydoctoring: The case against fragmented psychiatric care
MDedge Psychiatry
Machine learning flags key risk factors for suicide attempts
MDedge Psychiatry
Childhood smoking and depression contribute to young adult opioid use
MDedge Psychiatry
HHS will drop buprenorphine waiver rule for most physicians
MDedge Psychiatry
National spike in methamphetamine overdose deaths
MDedge Psychiatry
Psychiatric consequences of nitrous oxide abuse
MDedge Psychiatry
Naltrexone cuts hospitalization, deaths in alcohol use disorder
MDedge Psychiatry