Commentary

Why misinformation spreads


 

Are believing and sharing the same?

Interestingly, believing in a headline and sharing it are not the same. A study that investigated the difference between the two found that although individuals were able to discern the validity of headlines, the veracity of those headlines was not a determining factor in sharing the story on social media.

It has been suggested that social media context may distract individuals from engaging in deliberate thinking that would enhance their ability to determine the accuracy of the content. The dissociation between truthfulness and sharing may be a result of the “attention economy,” which refers to user engagement of likes, comments, shares, and so forth. As such, social media behavior and content consumption may not necessarily reflect one’s beliefs and may be influenced by what others value.

To combat the spread of misinformation, it has been suggested that proactive interventions – “prebunking” or “inoculation” – are necessary. This idea is in accordance with the inoculation theory, which suggests that pre-exposure can confer resistance to challenge. This line of thinking is aligned with the use of vaccines to counter medical illnesses. Increasing awareness of individual vulnerability to manipulation and misinformation has also been proposed as a strategy to resist persuasion.

The age old tale of what others think of us versus what we believe to be true has existed long before the viral overtake of social media. The main difference today is that social media acts as a catalyst for pockets of misinformation. Although social media outlets are cracking down on “false news,” we must consider what criteria should be employed to identify false information. Should external bodies regulate our content consumption? We are certainly entering a gray zone of “wrong” versus “right.” With the overabundance of information available online, it may be the case of “them” versus “us” – that is, those who do not believe in the existence of misinformation versus those who do.

Leanna M. W. Lui, HBSc, completed an HBSc global health specialist degree at the University of Toronto, where she is now an MSc candidate.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

COVID-clogged ICUs ‘terrify’ those with chronic or emergency illness
MDedge Psychiatry
COVID-19 linked to baby bust in high-income countries
MDedge Psychiatry
Politics or protection? What’s behind the push for boosters?
MDedge Psychiatry
Changing minds: What moves the needle for the unvaccinated?
MDedge Psychiatry
The trauma and healing of 9/11 echo in COVID-19
MDedge Psychiatry
COVID-19 linked to rise in suicide-related ED visits among youth
MDedge Psychiatry
Pandemic-related school closures tied to mental health inequities
MDedge Psychiatry
Sweeping new vaccine mandates will impact most U.S. workers
MDedge Psychiatry
Biden vaccine mandate rule could be ready within weeks
MDedge Psychiatry
FDA could authorize COVID-19 vaccine for ages 5-11 in October
MDedge Psychiatry