News

Film's side effects not worth the risks


 

I would not be so disparaging about "Side Effects" were it not for the possibility that its deep stupidity or flagrant indifference vis-a-vis the psychiatrist’s methods and person might prejudice viewers needing help. Granted their numbers might be few, given greater public awareness of mental disorders. But even one would be too many. TV commercials routinely caution that such-and-such nostrum might not be "right for everyone," then unreel a list of black box warnings and other disagreeable reactions (the sinister roll call frequently concludes with the very ailment for which the drug is prescribed in the first place, but farewell that). I believe "Side Effects" isn’t right for anyone. Take this review as a warning against Soderbergh’s deplorable black box.

Dr. Greenberg is a clinical professor of psychiatry at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Helping patients develop a 'psychic skin'
MDedge Psychiatry
Bipolar disorder and schizophrenia probably not the same disease
MDedge Psychiatry
Four genetic markers associated with five psychiatric disorders
MDedge Psychiatry
Far from the tree
MDedge Psychiatry
VIDEO: Reflections on the DSM-5
MDedge Psychiatry
Think depression when chronic pain worsens
MDedge Psychiatry
DSM-5 expected to be more 'user-friendly'
MDedge Psychiatry
Integrative care is the future of psychiatric care
MDedge Psychiatry
A taste for the unusual
MDedge Psychiatry
How to adapt CBT for older adults
MDedge Psychiatry