Rapid-cycling bipolar disorder is a moving target, with treatment-resistant depression recurring frequently and alternating with hypomanic/manic episodes (Box).1,2 Can one medication adequately treat these complicated patients, or is combination therapy necessary? If more than one medication is needed, are some combinations more effective than others?
This article attempts to answer these questions by:
- discussing recent treatment trial results
- suggesting an algorithm for managing hypomanic/manic and depressive episodes in rapid-cycling patients with bipolar disorder types I or II.
CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS
Rapid cycling is associated most consistently with female gender and bipolar II disorder2 (Table); why these two groups are primarily affected is unknown. Results of studies linking rapid cycling with hypothyroidism, gonadal steroid effects, family history, and substance use have been inconsistent and contradictory.2
Age of onset. Recent studies examining bipolar disorder’s age of onset have contradicted earlier rapid-cycling literature. In two large studies, Schneck et al3 and Coryell et al4 found rapid cycling associated with early onset of bipolar illness. The authors note that high rates of rapid cycling in children and adolescents resemble adult rapid cycling and speculate that early-onset bipolar illness might lead to rapid cycling vulnerability.5
Rapid cycling—defined in DSM-IV-TR as four or more depressive, manic, hypomanic, or mixed episodes in the previous 12 months—is considered a longitudinal course specifier for bipolar I or II disorder.1 Episodes must be demarcated by:
- full or partial remission lasting at least 2 months
- or a switch to a mood state of opposite polarity.
Cycling variations include ultra-rapid (1 day to 1 week), ultra-ultra rapid or ultradian (<24 hours), and continuous (no euthymic periods between mood episodes). Rapid cycling occurs in an estimated 15% to 25% of patients with bipolar disorder,2 though psychiatrists in specialty and tertiary referral centers see higher percentages because of the illness’ refractory nature.
Transient vs persistent state. Rapid cycling is thought to be either a transient state in long-term bipolar illness or a more chronic expression of the illness. Several studies6,7 have described rapid cycling as a transient phenomenon, whereas others8-11 have found a more persistent rapid cycling course during follow-up. Interestingly, a recent study11 suggested the mood-cycle pattern may be the most important predictor of rapid cycling. Patients with a depression–hypomania/mania-euthymia course demonstrated more-persistent rapid cycling than did those with a hypomania/mania-depression-euthymia course.
Antidepressants. Antidepressants’ role in initiating or exacerbating rapid cycling also remains unclear. Wehr et al8 found that discontinuing antidepressants contributed to cycling cessation or slowing. However, two prospective studies by Coryell et al4 that controlled for major depression found no association between antidepressant use and rapid cycling.
More recently, Yildiz and Sachs12 found a possible gender-specific relationship between antidepressants and rapid cycling. Women exposed to antidepressants before their first hypomanic/manic episode were more likely to develop rapid cycling than women who were not so exposed. This association was not evident in men.
NO DEFINITIVE CHOICES
Any discussion of treating rapid-cycling bipolar disorder is based on limited data, as few prospective studies of this exclusive cohort exist. Many studies report on mixed cohorts of refractory bipolar patients that include rapid cyclers, but separate analyses of rapid-cycling subgroups are not usually reported. Notable exceptions are recent studies by Calabrese et al, which are discussed below.
Lithium. Dunner and Fieve13 were the first to suggest that rapid-cycling bipolar patients respond poorly to lithium maintenance monotherapy. Later studies, however, suggested that lithium could benefit rapid cyclers, primarily in reducing hypomanic or manic episodes.
Baldessarini et al10 found that lithium was less effective for rapid than nonrapid cyclers only in reducing recurrence of depressive episodes. Kukopulos et al14 reported that lithium response in rapid cyclers increased from 16% to 78% after antidepressants were stopped, suggesting that a positive response to lithium may require more limited antidepressant use (or patients not having been exposed to antidepressants at all).
Thus, lithium prophylaxis has at least partial efficacy in many rapid cyclers, especially when antidepressants are avoided.
Divalproex. As with lithium, divalproex sodium appears more effective in treating and preventing hypomanic/manic episodes than depressive episodes in bipolar patients with rapid-cycling illness. Six open studies showed that patients who had not responded to lithium tended to do better with divalproex.15
Calabrese et al then tested the hypothesis that rapid cycling predicts nonresponse to lithium and positive response to divalproex.16 In a randomized controlled trial, they enrolled 254 recently hypomanic/manic rapid-cycling outpatients in an open-label stabilization phase involving combination lithium and divalproex therapy. Stabilized patients were then randomized to monotherapy with lithium, serum level ≥ 0.8 mEq/L, or divalproex, serum level ≥ 50 mcg/mL. Only 60 patients (24%) met stability criteria for randomization, achieving a persistent bimodal response as measured by continuous weeks of: