Commentary

Online clinical resources: To pay or not to pay?

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Open-source book technology allows users to contribute to and edit an online volume. Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org), the prototypical open-source site, hosts a free online encyclopedia.

Giles1 in 2005 found the accuracy of science entries in Wikipedia comparable to similar entries in Encyclopaedia Britannica. Among 42 entries from both encyclopedias, researchers found on average 4 errors per entry with Wikipedia and 3 with Encyclopaedia Britannica.

One sister Wiki project, Wikibooks (http://en.wikibooks.org), is designed to encourage production of open-source textbooks. This has led to one fledgling psychiatry textbook (http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Psychiatry) and others soon could follow. The clinical accuracy of this Wiki-based psychiatry textbook is variable, though this could improve if more psychiatrists become involved with Wikibook peer review.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Algorithms and guidelines: Superhighway road maps for treatment
MDedge Psychiatry
Schizophrenia is psychotic bipolar disorder? What a polarizing idea!
MDedge Psychiatry
Smartphones: Ask 4 questions before you buy
MDedge Psychiatry
Can virtual reality help your patients?
MDedge Psychiatry
Drs. Lake and Hurwitz respond
MDedge Psychiatry
A prescription to improve drug regimens?
MDedge Psychiatry
Getting too many e-alerts?
MDedge Psychiatry
PDA prescription program pros and cons
MDedge Psychiatry
Are irreputable health sites hurting your patients?
MDedge Psychiatry
PowerPoint: 6 presentation peeves
MDedge Psychiatry