News

Robotic surgery progress: Is resistance futile?


 

References

The company is currently promoting its da Vinci IX Surgical System. Cleared by the Food and Drug Administration in April 2014, Intuitive Surgical says that this latest version has broader capabilities than earlier generations and has been optimized for complex, multiquadrant surgeries.

Costs and other trade-offs

In some ways, robot-assisted surgery is following the same path as laparoscopic surgery, observed Dr. Tyler Hughes of the department of general surgery at McPherson (Kan.) Hospital.

“Certainly, we had the issue back in the late ‘80s and early ‘90s of laparoscopy,” Dr. Hughes said in an interview. “Was it cost effective? Because at the time $30,000 or $40,000 for a laparoscopic set-up seemed like a horse-choking amount of money. However, it converted a 5-day in-the-hospital experience to a 4-hour day-surgery experience. The nonclinical benefits to the patient were so enormous that it took the whole place by storm.”

Dr. Hughes, an ACS Fellow, suggested that the leap in savings elsewhere in the episode of care when using laparoscopic surgery over open surgery is not being mirrored in the robotic space and suggested that money should be spent in other areas of need.

“Cost is going to choke the future if we’re not careful. We need nurses. We need infrastructure. We need to be careful to buy things that really make a big difference,” he said.

In a study presented by at the ACS Clinical Congress on a cost-benefit analysis of robotic vs. laparoscopic colectomy, Anastasia Postoev, a fourth-year medical student at Caribbean Medical University in Willemstad, Curacao and her colleagues found little difference in clinical outcomes but higher costs as a result of added time needed to prepare the robot for surgery. The study showed that the potential up-front costs can be $1 to $2 million for the robot in addition to ongoing costs related to training and maintenance. Dr. Hughes said. “It is a terrific marketing tool in the sense that you can certainly attract a lot of people to a hospital with robotic surgery, but whether or not those outcomes are truly different and the cost of those outcomes are justifiable is yet to be determined.”

The ease of use of robotics, however, could end up being a double-edged sword, particularly if there are areas of the country where robotics may not be as pervasive, or in cases when a conversion to open surgery might be required.

“It is a real concern that trainees are being taught robotic surgery for what is not really needed to be robotic in the mainstream,” Dr. Hughes said. “Then they come out with less experience with straight stick laparoscopy and we’ve certainly seen lots of problems in the laparoscopic range for people once they get to the point that they have to convert to open. We really don’t have a large volume of trainee experience in complex open surgery. That’s a big problem. Robotics certainly isn’t going to make that a lot better.”

gtwachtman@frontlinemedcom.com

Pages

Recommended Reading

Hospitals report inadequate duodenoscope reprocessing practices
MDedge Surgery
Decline in antibiotic effectiveness could harm surgical, chemotherapy patients
MDedge Surgery
ACS: Less pneumonia, fewer deaths with ketamine for rib fracture pain
MDedge Surgery
Psychiatrists’ role in bariatric surgery important
MDedge Surgery
Frail elders at high mortality risk in the year following surgery
MDedge Surgery
Early TIPS tied to mortality reduction in esophageal bleeds
MDedge Surgery
Concurrent mesh herniorrhaphy with bowel surgery doesn’t up morbidity
MDedge Surgery
Study: High rate of medical errors in postop drug administrations
MDedge Surgery
Magnetic sphincter device clicks in real-world GERD patients
MDedge Surgery
CDC to celebrate best blood clot prevention strategies
MDedge Surgery