Upper extremity injuries are very common in pitchers in amateur and professional baseball. The vast majority involving labral or rotator cuff pathology.1-3 While uncommon, injuries to the latissimus dorsi (LD) (Figure) and teres major (TM) have been reported in Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers.4 Jobe and colleagues5 demonstrated the role of the LD during the various phases of pitching. The LD is most active during the acceleration phase and remains active during the deceleration phase and follow-through.6 Anatomically, the TM lies posterior to the LD separated by bursal tissue. The tendon fibers converge and unite along their lower borders, leading to a synergistic mechanism of action.
Due to the rarity of LD and TM injuries, literature on the pathology and appropriate treatments for these injuries is limited. The goal of this review is to present the current literature on professional baseball players who have undergone either nonsurgical treatment or surgery for LD and TM strains and/or avulsion injuries. This review will ultimately assist clinicians when deciding on the optimal treatment method for professional baseball players.
Methods
We performed an extensive Medline database search with the following search algorithm: ([latissimus OR latissimus dorsi OR teres major] AND baseball). The search returned 20 citations. Inclusion criteria consisted of clinical studies that focused on professional baseball pitchers with TM and/or LD injuries that underwent either conservative nonsurgical treatment or surgical repair. There was no exclusion based on the type of injury present, such as avulsion vs strain. Any study with amateur athletes or athletes from other sports such as handball or rugby were excluded. Due to the limited amount of data available, the majority of included studies were case reports and case series.
Based on these parameters, 5 articles met criteria for inclusion. Of the 5 included studies, 3 were case reports and 2 were case series. From the eligible articles, the following information was obtained: publication year, sample size, mean age, mean follow-up duration, type of treatment (conservative vs surgical), ability to return to original level of play, time required to return to original form, and complications (Tables 1, 2).
Results
Nonoperative Management
Four of the 5 included studies implemented only conservative therapy for their patients.4,7-9 The average duration these patients were followed for during treatment and rehabilitation was 26.3 months. Malcolm and colleagues7 followed patients for 8 months, the shortest length among the 4 conservative studies in this review. Leland and colleagues8 followed patients for 17 months, and Nagda and colleagues9 had the longest length of observation of 36 months (range 12 to 82 months).Schickendantz and colleagues4 followed patients for >12 months, but the exact duration was not specified. In order to calculate the average duration of observation, each patient was assigned a duration of 12 months.
Of the 30 patients included in this review, 29 were treated conservatively. All of the included studies consisted of male patients. The mean age was 26.8 years (range 22 to 28.1 years). Of the 29 injuries treated conservatively, there were 2 LD tendon avulsions, 4 TM tendon avulsions, 1 LD and TM tendon avulsion, 7 LD intramuscular strains, 9 TM intramuscular strains, and 6 LD and TM intramuscular strains.
Treatment Protocol
The various treatment and rehabilitation programs used for the conservative patient population all followed a similar pathway. After initial injury, a rest period focused on stretching was implemented. Patients were started on steroid or anti-inflammatory medications, cryotherapy, or other therapeutic modalities. Once pain-free and full range of motion was achieved, patients began the strength and throwing components of the rehabilitation program. Reoccurrence of symptoms would halt the throwing component of the rehabilitation program until symptoms improved. Patients were progressed through a return-to-throw program and once they could throw off the mound and achieve their preinjury velocity, strength, and range of motion, they were cleared to return to competitive pitching.
In the senior author’s (MSS) practice, all throwers are managed with the same nonoperative protocol.4 Initial treatment consists of short periods of rest and symptom control via the application of cryotherapy, among other modalities. Restoration of preinjury range of motion is achieved with active-assisted stretching exercises. As range of motion begins approaching pre-injury levels, strength training is initiated with isometric strengthening of the LD and TM progressing to resistance exercises. Exercising the abdominal core, strengthening the lower body, and cardiovascular conditioning are focal points of the rehabilitation period. Once patients regain preinjury shoulder strength and range of motion without pain, they begin a throwing program that consists of 4 weeks of long toss followed by 2 weeks of throwing from the pitching mound. After completion of the throwing program, the patient is allowed to return to competitive pitching. For patients who did not suffer season-ending injury, the average time required to return to play was 99.8 days (range 72.3 to 182.6 days).