Clinical Review

Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement: Labrum, Cartilage, Osseous Deformity, and Capsule

Author and Disclosure Information

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) surgery aims to restore the native anatomical relationships between bones and the soft tissues comprising the hip joint. The goal of this approach is to mimic the natural biomechanical function of the hip joint and translate it into a perfect clinical outcome. In this article, we describe the indications and contraindications for our preferred hip arthroscopic techniques for correcting FAI in both primary and revision cases and discuss the role of postoperative rehabilitation and use of biologics in further improving patient outcomes.


 

References

Take-Home Points

  • Repair the labrum when tissue quality is good.
  • Avoid overcorrection of acetabulum by measuring center edge angle.
  • Cam resection should be comprehensive and restore a smooth head-neck offset to restore the suction seal.
  • Chondral débridement for Outerbridge grade 0-3 and microfracture for grade 4.
  • Routine capsular closure to prevent postoperative instability.

The surgical approach of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) pathology should cover the entire hip joint. Both bony and cartilaginous tissue pathology should be adequately addressed. However, treating soft-tissue abnormalities (acetabular labrum and joint capsule) is also crucial. Overall, any surgical intervention should focus on restoring the hip labrum seal mechanism to ensure successful clinical outcomes. This restoration, combined with the use of biological therapies and rehabilitation, will produce the maximum benefit for the patient.

Management of Acetabular Labrum

The final decision regarding how to surgically approach the acetabular labrum is made during the operation. We focus restoring the labrum seal mechanism, which is crucial for proper function and health of the hip joint.1 The intra-articular hydrostatic pressure loss caused by labral deficiency results in abnormal load distribution and joint microinstability, which have detrimental effects on cartilage and periarticular tissues. A biomechanical study highlighted the role of the hip labrum in maintaining intra-articular fluid pressurization and showed that labral reconstruction restores intra-articular fluid pressure to levels similar to those of the intact state.1

In cases in which the remaining labral tissue is adequate and of good quality (reparable), the labral repair technique is preferred.2 After diagnostic arthroscopy, the labral tear is identified, and a 4.5-mm burr is used to correct (rim-trim) any osseous deformity of the acetabulum to create a “new rim” for labrum reattachment. Suture anchors are placed on the rim about 2 mm to 3 mm below the cartilage surface. Considering the rim angle3 is helpful in avoiding acetabular cartilage damage. Labral sutures can be looped around or pierced through the labrum to secure it to the acetabulum. No difference in clinical outcomes was found between the 2 suture types,4 though biomechanically piercing sutures help restore the labrum seal better.1 When the labrum is deficient and longitudinal fibers remain but are insufficient for seal restoration, the repair can be augmented with adjacent iliotibial band (ITB) tissue. This technique is similar to labral reconstruction but involves placing a graft on top of the remaining labral tissue, and suture around both the native tissue and the graft. The additional tissue gives the labrum the volume it needs to recreate the seal.

The labral reconstruction technique is indicated when the remaining labrum is irreparable, absent, or severely hypotrophic or deficient, or when an irreparable complex tear or poor-quality tissue is present. Different types of grafts can be used to reconstruct the labrum. ITB, semitendinosus, gracilis, and anterior tibialis grafts and the human acetabular labrum exhibit similar cyclic elongation behavior in response to simulated physiologic forces, though there is variability in both elongation and geometry for all graft types.5 We prefer the ITB autograft technique.6 The graft should be about 30% to 40% longer than the labral defect as measured with arthroscopic probe. With the leg in traction, the graft is inserted through the mid-anterior portal, and a suture anchor is used to secure it against the acetabulum medially.

Figure 1.
Next, the lateral side of the graft is secured, and the rest of the defect is filled using suture anchors along the midportion of the graft. For better adjustment of the graft along the defect, additional sutures can be used when connecting the graft with the native labrum (Figure 1).

With proper patient selection, these techniques have excellent clinical outcomes.4,7 Severe osteoarthritis (joint space <2 mm) is a contraindication for these procedures.8

Osseous Deformity

On approaching the bony structures of the hip joint, the surgeon should examine the acetabular rim (pincer lesion), the femoral head and neck shape (cam lesion), and the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS). Preoperative imaging and physical examination are important for identifying severe bone deformities that can complicate the procedure.9

The acetabular rim can be directly viewed after labrum detachment, but usually complete detachment is not necessary. Pincer deformity causes focal or global overcoverage of the femoral head. Rim trimming is performed with a 4.5-mm round curved burr. Resection is usually performed to the end of rim chondrosis (about 3-5 mm). Using a simple formula, you can calculate how the lateral center edge will be reduced by the amount of rim resected, maintaining a safe margin.2 A new acetabular “bed” is created where the to-be-attached labral tissue will contribute to the suction seal mechanism of the joint.2Cam lesion correction is challenging, and the amount of bone that should be resected is a matter of disagreement. We perform cam osteochondroplasty2 with a 5.5-mm round burr inserted through the anterolateral portal while the hip is positioned in 45° of flexion, neutral rotation, and adduction/abduction. This position allows an osteoplasty from 6 to 10 o’clock on the head–neck junction. Osteoplasty performed between 10 and 12 o’clock requires hip extension and slight traction. The proximal limit of osteochondroplasty is about 15 mm from the labral edge, while distally the resection stops beneath the zona orbicularis. The lateral epiphyseal vessels and the Weitbrecht ligament constitute the lateral and medial borders, respectively.

The surgeon should create a smooth head–neck offset that prevents elevation of the labrum during flexion and achieves a nearly perfect anatomical relationship between the femoral head and the acetabular labrum, restoring the hip joint seal (Figure 2).

Figure 2.
We think intraoperative dynamic hip examination is the most important element in determining adequacy of resection.10 The hip bony congruency is directly viewed intra-articularly and is assessed through full range of motion. Performing this maneuver multiple times during surgery helps the surgeon to decide how much bone to resect, given the unique anatomical characteristics and postoperative expectations of the patient. Care should be taken not to overresect the femoral head–neck junction.

A hypertrophic AIIS can impinge the femur (extra-articular subspinal impingement). Patients present with limited range of motion (especially hip flexion), pain in the AIIS area, and, in some cases, a history of avulsion injury.11 Seeing a bruised labrum (Figure 3) during surgery is common with this pathology.

Figure 3.
The inferolateral corner of the footprint of the direct head of the rectus femoris is 19.2 mm from the acetabular rim, and the inferolateral aspect of the iliocapsularis footprint is 12.5 mm from the rim.12 Therefore, a 4.5-mm burr is used to decompress the area below the AIIS, as well as the correspondent impingement lesion on the femoral neck. During surgery, dynamic hip examination is performed to evaluate the result.11

Pages

Recommended Reading

Direct Anterior Versus Posterior Simultaneous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasties: No Major Differences at 90 Days
MDedge Surgery
Anti–nerve growth factor drug has long-term OA pain benefit, but unclear safety
MDedge Surgery
VIDEO: Biologics: Proposed guideline addresses perioperative management
MDedge Surgery
Comparing Cost, Efficacy, and Safety of Intravenous and Topical Tranexamic Acid in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery
T-Capsulotomy to Improve Visualization of the Peripheral Compartment and Repair
MDedge Surgery
Bariatric surgery or total joint replacement: which first?
MDedge Surgery
Evolution of Femoroacetabular Impingement Treatment: The ANCHOR Experience
MDedge Surgery
Multicenter Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy: Epidemiology (MASH Study Group). What Are We Seeing in the Office, and Who Are We Choosing to Treat?
MDedge Surgery
Current Concepts in Labral Repair and Refixation: Anatomical Approach to Labral Management
MDedge Surgery
Current Techniques in Treating Femoroacetabular Impingement: Capsular Repair and Plication
MDedge Surgery