Commentary

Shoulder Arthroplasty in Cases of Significant Bone Loss: An Overview

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

GLENOID BONE LOSS

Proper glenoid component placement with durable fixation is crucial for success in anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty and RSA. Glenoid bone deformity and loss can result from intrinsic deformity characteristics seen in primary osteoarthritis, cuff tear arthropathy, or glenoid component removal in revision situations and infection. These bone deformity complications can be extremely difficult to treat and in some cases lead to catastrophic failure of the index arthroplasty.

We are now aware that one key to success in the face of moderate to severe deformity is proper recognition. Newer imaging techniques, including 2-dimensional (2-D) computed tomography (CT) and 3-dimensional (3-D) modeling and surgical planning software tools, which are outlined in an upcoming article, have given surgeons important new instruments that can help in treating these difficult cases.

Glenoid bone deformity in primary osteoarthritis was well delineated in the 1999 seminal study of CT changes by Walch and colleagues.1 The Walch classification system, which characterized glenoid morphology based on 2-D CT findings, was recently upgraded, based on 3-D imaging technology, to include Walch B3 and D patterns (Figure 1).2 Recognition of certain primary deformities in osteoarthritis has led to increased use of RSA in some cases of Walch B2, B3, and C deformities with substantial glenoid retroversion and/or humeral head subluxation.4

Modified Walch classification of glenoid deformity in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with the B3 glenoid defined as a monoconcave ad posteriorly worn glenoid

In cases of rotator cuff tear arthropathy, glenoid bone deformities are well described with several classification systems based on degree and dimension of bone insufficiency. The Hamada classification system defines the degree of medial glenoid erosion and superior bone loss, as well as acetabularization of the acromion in 5 grades; 5 Rispoli and colleagues6 defined and graded the degree of medicalization of the glenohumeral joint based on degree of subchondral plate erosion; and Visotsky and colleagues7 based their classification system on wear patterns of bone loss, alignment, and concomitant soft-tissue insufficiencies leading to instability and rotation loss.

In severe glenoid bone deficiency after glenoid component removal, Antuna and colleagues8 described the classic findings related to medial bone loss, anterior and posterior wall failure, and combinations thereof.

Continue to: All these classification systems...

Recommended Reading

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty and Latissimus Dorsi Tendon Transfer
MDedge Surgery
Radial Shaft Stress Fracture in a Major League Pitcher
MDedge Surgery
Acute Shortening Versus Bridging Plate for Highly Comminuted Olecranon Fractures
MDedge Surgery
Superior Capsular Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes After Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up
MDedge Surgery
Effects of Platelet-Rich Plasma and Indomethacin on Biomechanics of Rotator Cuff Repair
MDedge Surgery
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty With a Hybrid Dual-Radii Glenoid Component
MDedge Surgery
Predicting 1-Year Postoperative Visual Analog Scale Pain Scores and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Function Scores in Total and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery
For women with RA, small-joint surgery rate nearly twice that of men
MDedge Surgery
Biceps Tenodesis: A Comparison of Tendon-to-Bone and Tendon-to-Tendon Healing in a Rat Model
MDedge Surgery
Management of Isolated Greater Tuberosity Fractures: A Systematic Review
MDedge Surgery