Commentary

Commentary to "Patient-Specific Imaging and Missed Tumors: A Catastrophic Outcome"

Author and Disclosure Information

 

The idiom “penny wise, pound foolish” certainly applies in this report of 2 cases of missed bone tumors that were present but not recognized on preoperative imaging prior to placement of patient-specific knee arthroplasties. The case report appeared in the December 2013 issue of The American Journal of Orthopedics. The term “non-diagnostic imaging,” itself a paradox, used in the context of preoperative imaging performed solely for the purpose of component templating for patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and not intended to be diagnostic in purpose, would be anathematic to most radiologists and should be discarded as a concept.

Bearing in mind the costs incurred by the patient undergoing a total knee arthroplasty (TKA), such as professional consultation, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, customized manufacture of the components, surgery and associated costs, and postoperative rehabilitation, the fee for a formal report by a musculoskeletal radiologist is comparatively minuscule. As correctly pointed out by the authors, the price associated with bypassing any assessment and missing malignant disease is far greater.

It is well recognized that unreported radiologic examinations can lead to misdiagnosis, compromised patient care, and liability concerns. As PSI is relatively new and has good potential to increase the accuracy, precision and efficiency of TKA, it is even more vital that this promising technology not be marred by disrepute due to possible devastating outcomes resulting from lack of a radiologic report. From the professional point of view of a radiologist, the issuance of a formal report is part and parcel of any radiological examination. I would argue that obtaining radiologic images without an accompanying report constitutes an incomplete study, and will not be in the best interest of patients.

Let the lessons learned from these 2 cases be a springboard to establish protocols for proper utilization of technologies involved in PSI for TKA and other orthopedic procedures. It is imperative to put into place mandatory reporting of all diagnostic images obtained for preoperative evaluation, particularly those that are meant to be sent directly to implant manufacturers for component design.

Menge TJ, Hartley KG, Holt GE. Patient-Specific Imaging and Missed Tumors: A Catastrophic Outcome. Am J Orthop. 2013;42(12):553-556.

Recommended Reading

Progressive Hematoma in an Older Adult: Closed Internal Degloving Injury of the Knee
MDedge Surgery
Calcium Pyrophosphate Dihydrate Crystal Deposition Disease (Pseudogout) of Lumbar Spine Mimicking Osteomyelitis-Discitis With Epidural Phlegmon
MDedge Surgery
Avoiding Unplanned Resections of Wrist Sarcomas: An Algorithm for Evaluating Dorsal Wrist Masses
MDedge Surgery
Traumatic Obterator Hip Traumatic Obterator Hip Dislocation in a 9-Year-Old Boy Dislocation in a 9-Year-Old Boy
MDedge Surgery
Neck–Shoulder Crossover: How Often Do Neck and Shoulder Pathology Masquerade as Each Other?
MDedge Surgery
Mixed results with angiography for splenic injuries
MDedge Surgery
Tibia-Based Referencing for Standard Proximal Tibial Radiographs During Intramedullary Nailing
MDedge Surgery
Repeat CT selectively in children with traumatic brain injuries
MDedge Surgery
Surgeons' Perception of Fluoroscopic Radiation Hazards to Vision
MDedge Surgery
Patient-Specific Imaging and Missed Tumors: A Catastrophic Outcome
MDedge Surgery