Education Center

Perioperative Pain Management in Hip and Knee Replacement Surgery

This supplement was supported by a grant from Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Author and Disclosure Information

Many patients who undergo hip or knee replacement surgery today experience high levels of postoperative pain. Data from clinical studies and analyses of hospital records have demonstrated that severe postoperative pain is associated with an increased risk for complications, slowing of the rehabilitation process, delayed return to normal functioning, progression to persistent pain states, prolonged length of hospital stay, elevated rates of readmission, and higher overall costs. Orthopedic surgeons may now play a more active role in reducing the severity of pain following surgery, decreasing both opioid use and the incidence of opioid-related adverse events, and eliminating breakthrough pain and analgesic gaps. The benefits of multimodal regimens that include a combination of agents acting synergistically have been established unequivocally, and many analgesic and anesthetic agents are now available, as well as treatment options that differ according to route of administration. It is therefore possible to individualize treatment based on the type of procedure and patient need. One exciting advance that offers effective, safe, and efficient analgesia for many kinds of surgical procedures is the introduction of an extended-release local anesthetic (liposomal bupivacaine) for infiltration. This new option, which can be administered directly
into the knee or hip by an orthopedic surgeon, is an example of the changing paradigm in perioperative analgesia, where commitment, communication, and coordination across all members of the clinical care team—including the surgeon, anesthesiologist, pharmacist, physical therapist, and nursing staff—are fundamental elements of an improved standard of care. An Expert Working Group on Anesthesia & Orthopaedics: Critical Issues in Hip and Knee Replacement Arthroplasty (April 13, 2013; Dallas, Texas) evaluated current approaches to perioperative pain management and proposed new regimens to help achieve optimal outcomes in these procedures.


 

Recommended Reading

A Multidisciplinary Total Hip Arthroplasty Protocol With Accelerated Postoperative Rehabilitation: Does the Patient Benefit?
MDedge Surgery
Re-examining the Safety Issues of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearing Surface
MDedge Surgery
Metallosis After Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery
Hyponatremia After Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Incidence and Associated Risk Factors
MDedge Surgery
Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States: Safety and Risk Issues Revisited
MDedge Surgery
Intrathoracic Fracture-Dislocation of the Proximal Humerus Treated with Rib Fixation and Shoulder Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery
Total Hip and Knee Replacement in a Patient with Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita
MDedge Surgery
Quadriceps and Patellar Tendon Pie-Crusting as a Treatment for Limited Flexion in Total Knee Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery
Knee Mass From Severe Metallosis After Failure of a Metal-Backed Patellar Component Total Knee Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery
Failed First Metatarsophalangeal Arthroplasty Salvaged by Hamstring Interposition Arthroplasty: Metallic Debris From Grommets
MDedge Surgery