Original Research

The Role of Computed Tomography for Postoperative Evaluation of Percutaneous Sacroiliac Screw Fixation and Description of a “Safe Zone”

Am J Orthop. 2014 November;43(11):513-516

References

1. Failinger MS, McGanity PL. Unstable fractures of the pelvic ring. J Bone and Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(5):781-791.

2. Smith HE, Yuan PS, Sasso R, Papadopolous S, Vaccaro AR. An evaluation of image-guided technologies in the placement of percutaneous iliosacral screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(2):234-238.

3. Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E. Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and surgical approaches for open reduction. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964;46(16):1615-1646.

4. Routt ML Jr, Kregor PJ, Simonian PT, Mayo KA. Early results of percutaneous iliosacral screws placed with the patient in the supine position. J Orthop Trauma. 1995;9(3):207-214.

5. Tonetti J, Carrat L, Blendea S, et al. Clinical results of percutaneous pelvic surgery. Computer assisted surgery using ultrasound compared to standard fluoroscopy. Comput Aided Surg. 2001;6(4):204-211.

6. Ebraheim NA, Coombs R, Jackson WT, Rusin JJ. Percutaneous computed tomography-guided stabilization of posterior pelvic fractures. Clin Orthop. 1994;(307):222-228.

7. Keating JF, Werier J, Blachut P, et al. Early fixation of the vertically unstable pelvis: the role of iliosacral screw fixation of the posterior lesion. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13(2):107-113.

8. Webb LX, de Araujo W, Donofrio P, et al. Electromyography monitoring for percutaneous placement of iliosacral screws. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14(4):245-254.

9. Barrick EF, O’Mara JW, Lane HE 3rd. Iliosacral screw insertion using computer-assisted CT image guidance: a laboratory study. Comput Aided Surg. 1998;3(6):289-296.

10. Routt ML Jr, Simonian PT, Agnew SG, Mann FA. Radiographic recognition of the sacral alar slope for optimal placement of iliosacral screws: a cadaveric and clinical study. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10(3):171-177.

11. Altman DT, Jones CB, Routt ML Jr. Superior gluteal artery injury during iliosacral screw placement. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13(3):220-227.

12. Stephen DJ. Pseudoaneurysm of the superior gluteal arterial system: an unusual cause of pain after a pelvic fracture. J Trauma. 1997;43(1):146-149.

13. Stöckle U, König B, Hofstetter R, Nolte LP, Haas NP. [Navigation assisted by image conversion. An experimental study on pelvic screw fixation]
[in German]. Unfallchirurg. 2001;104(3):215-220.

14. Templeman D, Schmidt A, Freese J, Weisman I, et al. Proximity of iliosacral screws to neurovascular structures after internal fixation. Clin Orthop. 1996;(329):194-198.

15. Young JW, Burgess AR, Brumback RJ, Poka A. Pelvic fractures: value of plain radiography in early assessment and management. Radiology. 1986;160(2):445-451.

16. Graves ML, Routt ML Jr. Iliosacral screw placement: are uniplanar changes realistic based on standard fluoroscopic imaging? J Trauma. 2011;7(1):204-208.

17. Letournel E. Pelvic fractures. Injury. 1978;10(2):145-148.

18. Blake-Toker AM, Hawkins L, Nadalo L, et al. CT guided percutaneous fixation of sacroiliac fractures in trauma patients. J Trauma. 2001;51(6):1117-1121.

19. Hinsche AF, Giannoudis PV, Smith RM. Fluoroscopy-based multiplanar image guidance for insertion of sacroiliac screws. Clin Orthop. 2002;(395):135-144.

20. van den Bosch EW, van Zwienen CM, van Vugt AB. Fluoroscopic positioning of sacroiliac screws in 88 patients. J Trauma. 2002;53(1):44-48.

21. Cole JD, Blum DA, Ansel LJ. Outcome after fixation of unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries. Clin Orthop. 1996;(329):160-179.

22. Routt ML Jr, Simonian PT. Closed reduction and percutaneous skeletal fixation of sacral fractures. Clin Orthop. 1996;(329):121-128.

In our study, we used the technique described by Matta and colleagues for placement of the screws and performed a postoperative CT to evaluate screw placement and to assess pelvic reduction.⁷ We had a high penetration rate using CT, which increased with better resolution, even though none of the radiographs showed any obvious evidence of misplacement of the screws. Ebraheim and colleagues⁶ described the relationship of the S1 nerve root in its neural foramen and found it to be approximately 8.7 mm inferior and 7.8 mm medial to the starting point for a pedicle screw. Given these numbers, it is possible that a large amount of skiving can be tolerated contingent on an adequate reduction of the SI joint.

Because of our high rates of skiving and low rates of neurologic deficit, a new “safe zone” for screw insertion can be expanded to include skiving of the S1 neural foramen up to 3 mm without fear of nerve root injury. However, drilling and screw insertion at higher speeds can also cause neurologic injury secondary to thermal injury or soft tissue being caught up in a rotating drill/screw.

Evaluation of placement of percutaneous SI screw placement in our study resulted in neural foramen penetration in 43% of SI screws, which is higher than other studies.^14,19,20 Our study showed that screw penetration up to 2 mm does not correlate with neurologic deficit. Iatrogenic neurologic deficit secondary to perforation of the foramina occurred in only 1 patient. Penetration of the foramina in all cases was in the superior portion of the foramen. We propose that there is a safe zone within the S1 neural foramen, and small amounts of penetration in the superior one-third of the foramen on axial CT images do not correlate with neurologic deficit. This potential safe zone is predicated on adequate reduction of the SI joint.

Neural foramen penetration shown on postoperative CT does not necessarily correlate with neurologic deficit. A postoperative CT is not indicated unless there are findings of a postoperative nerve injury. Our ideal screw placement skives the superior S1 foramen allowing for a larger screw diameter in a safe zone.

CT-guided placement has been proposed; however, concerns about radiation exposure, cost, and feasibility with similar outcomes compared with fluoroscopic-guided screw placement has resulted in its falling out of favor.

Iatrogenic nerve injuries are reported to occur in 0% to 6% of all percutaneous SI screw placement.^14,21 Risk factors for iatrogenic nerve injury while using fluoroscopic guidance include sacral morphologic abnormalities, presence of intestinal gas, or contrast.²²Although these may be minimized with proper use of fluoroscopy, obtaining anatomic reduction as well as a thorough understanding of the pelvic morphology, the surgeon must be prepared to obtain further studies, such as a CT scan, if there is postoperative neurologic deficit.

Based on our findings, we do not routinely obtain a postoperative CT for SI screw placement, unless there is concern for malreduction or there is neurologic deficit. We also believe that up to 2 mm of foramen penetration is safe and does not result in neurologic deficit.