News

STS: Risk score predicts rehospitalization after heart surgery

View on the News

Rehospitalization risk models show marginal performance

Identifying the factors that determine whether a patient will need rehospitalization following discharge after heart surgery is a huge and unresolved problem. Risk models for the rate of hospital readmission following cardiothoracic surgery have historically performed poorly. Perhaps that’s because the models often fail to include factors with the strongest impact on readmissions. Most of the factors that appear to drive readmissions seem to be out of the direct control of hospital staffs, such as a lack of support for patients once they leave the hospital. Socioeconomic factors like this have usually not been included in risk models.

Dr. David M. Shahian

The C statistic (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) for the model reported by Dr. Kilic was 0.66, very close to the 0.648 that my colleagues and I reported in 2014 for a risk model of 30-day hospital readmission following isolated coronary artery bypass grafting that used data from more than 162,000 Medicare patients who underwent surgery during 2008-2010 (Circulation. 2014 July 29;130[5]:399-409). This means that both models accounted for roughly two-thirds of the variability in readmission rates, which makes our model as well as Dr. Kilic’s model marginal in its ability to identify patients at greatest risk. Similar limitations exist for the other reported models for assessing the readmission risk following heart surgery.

One strength of the model reported by Dr. Kilic was its inclusion of patient factors that developed following the start of the index admission, such as postoperative acute renal failure.

Dr. David M. Shahian is a professor of surgery at Harvard Medical School and associate director of the Codman Center for Clinical Effectiveness in Surgery at the Massachusetts General Hospital, both in Boston. He made these comments during the discussion of Dr. Kilic’s report. Dr. Shahian had no relevant financial disclosures.


 

AT THE STS ANNUAL MEETING

References

Patients with a score of 0 had a 6% rate of a 30-day readmission; those with a score of 22 had a 63% readmission rate. For simplicity, Dr. Kilic suggested dividing patients into three categories based on their readmission risk score: Low-risk patients with a score of 0 had a readmission risk of 6%, medium-risk patients with a score of 1-10 had a readmission risk of 12%, and high-risk patients with a score of 11 or more had a readmission risk of 31%. The researchers found a 96% correlation when comparing these predicted readmission risk rates based on the derivation-subgroup analysis with the actual readmission rates seen in the validation subgroup of their database. The targeted risk-management program planned by Dr. Conte would primarily focus on high-risk patients.

Dr. Kilic and Dr. Conte said they had no relevant financial disclosures.

mzoler@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter@mitchelzoler

Pages

Recommended Reading

Immediate treatment yields best outcomes in NSTEMI MI
MDedge Cardiology
Post-repair MR may be worse than thought
MDedge Cardiology
Off-pump bypass may confer stroke benefit
MDedge Cardiology
Finding more transplant hearts but not more donors
MDedge Cardiology
FDA approves marketing of sutureless aortic valve
MDedge Cardiology
STS: Score stratifies risks for isolated tricuspid valve surgery patients
MDedge Cardiology
VIDEO: Shorter gap from heart attack to CABG shown safe
MDedge Cardiology
VIDEO: U.S. TAVR growth continues, mostly among octogenarians
MDedge Cardiology
Ischemic mitral regurgitation: valve repair vs. replacement
MDedge Cardiology
Guidelines in works to tackle ruptured AAA transfers
MDedge Cardiology