Coding

Electronic Health Records, Autocoding, and Ewe: Don’t Be a Sheep!

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Of course, you may argue that the effort needed for the E&M work for the procedure was above and beyond what is typical for the service, which can be a hard standard to meet. Although the CMS requires a “significant and separately identifiable E&M service” as noted above and a separate diagnosis is not needed, the onus is on you to prove it. It is much easier to have a separate diagnosis that stands on its own, which will probably make an audit less common (unless you do it too often).

Final Thoughts

In summary, document what you do, do what you document, and report what is medically necessary. Keep watch over your EHR to be sure it is not overcoding for you. You do not want to be a ewe!

Pages

Recommended Reading

State board discipline of physicians varies widely by state
MDedge Dermatology
Could value-based care raise False Claims Act liability?
MDedge Dermatology
Coding Changes for 2016
MDedge Dermatology
Landscape of Business Models in Teledermatology
MDedge Dermatology
UnitedHealth Group leaving most ACA marketplaces
MDedge Dermatology
Boards Review Resources
MDedge Dermatology
CMS promises streamlined, flexible program to replace meaningful use
MDedge Dermatology
CMS: MACRA impact on small/solo practices not as dramatic as predicted in regs
MDedge Dermatology
Mastering MACRA: How to thrive under new payment models
MDedge Dermatology
Judge says feds overstepped on ACA cost-sharing subsidies
MDedge Dermatology