Traumatic ulcerative granuloma with stromal eosinophilia (TUGSE) is an uncommon, benign, self-limited condition that is restricted to the oral mucosa, most commonly seen in the fifth to seventh decades of life.1-3 The pathogenesis of TUGSE is unknown, but current theory suggests trauma is the instigating factor. The presence of CD30+ mononuclear cells within TUGSE raises the possibility of a CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorder in some cases.4 However, because CD30+ cells are not uncommon in other benign reactive processes, they may simply represent a reactive phenomenon.3
Traumatic ulcerative granuloma with stromal eosinophilia traverses multiple disciplines, including dermatology, oral surgery, dentistry, and pathology, resulting in a diverse nomenclature including traumatic granuloma of the tongue, traumatic eosinophilic granuloma of the oral mucosa, ulcerated granuloma eosinophilicum diutinum, and eosinophilic ulcer of the oral mucosa.1,4-6 It is important to differentiate eosinophilic granuloma of the oral mucosa from the eosinophilic granuloma that is associated with Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Although both may present with oral ulceration, Langerhans cell–associated eosinophilic granuloma typically develops from underlying bone, whereas eosinophilic granuloma of the oral mucosa (TUGSE) is described as nonosseous.7,8 Furthermore, the gingiva is the most common oral site in Langerhans cell–associated eosinophilic granuloma, whereas the tongue is most commonly involved in TUGSE.8 Shapiro and Juhlin9 clearly distinguished TUGSE from Langerhans cell–associated eosinophilic granuloma in 1970. Histologically, the 2 conditions are completely different.
When ulcerative granulomas develop in the pediatric population, usually in children younger than 2 years, it is termed Riga-Fede disease.10 These children were typically breastfeeding, suckling, or teething, suggesting trauma as a triggering event. In 1961, Hjorting-Hansen and Schmidt5 described 3 separate lesions similar to Riga-Fede disease in an adult patient. Subsequently, Riga-Fede disease was grouped under TUGSE.3
Histologically, TUGSE shows an ulcerated epithelium with a polymorphic inflammatory cell infiltrate that has a large predominance of eosinophils. The infiltrate affects the superficial and deep layers of the muscle tissue and penetrates into the salivary glands. Large atypical mononuclear cells with an ovoid and pale-appearing nucleus often are present. These cells may be mitotically active and stain positively for CD30.1,4,11 CD68+ macrophages, T lymphocytes, and factor XIIIa–positive dendritic cells commonly are present.12
Given the presence of large atypical CD30+ cells in many lesions, the possibility of a CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorder has been postulated by some authors. Indeed, lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) has been documented to involve the oral mucosa.2,4
Case Report
An 81-year-old man presented with a rapidly enlarging, 1.7×1.3-cm, vascular-appearing nodule with a collarette of mucosal epithelium on the left side of the dorsal surface of the tongue of 2 weeks’ duration (Figure 1). He denied any history of trauma, tobacco chewing, weight change, fever, or fatigue; however, he did report a 30 pack-year smoking history. There was no other pertinent medical history to include medications or allergies.
The differential diagnosis included pyogenic granuloma, granular cell tumor, squamous cell carcinoma, other neoplasms (eg, oral lymphoma, salivary gland tumors), and a traumatic blood blister from tongue biting. The patient was referred to the oral maxillofacial surgery department for an excisional biopsy, which showed a solitary ulcerated nodule with associated granulation tissue, thrombus, and fibrinoid debris (Figure 2). A surrounding dense mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate composed of lymphocytes, histiocytes, and numerous eosinophils was noted extending through the submucosal tissue and underlying striated muscle fibers (Figure 3). The adjacent mucosal epithelium appeared normal. CD30 staining showed only rare positive cells. These findings were consistent with TUGSE.
Due to the benign nature of TUGSE, the patient was released with symptomatic care and instructed to return for any new growth. The growth spontaneously resolved over 1 month and no recurrence or new lesions were reported 1 year later.