Case Reports

Secukinumab Emerges as a Rapidly Effective Therapy for Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris

Author and Disclosure Information

Refractory pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) often is treated off-label with the same biologic therapies that are approved for the treatment of psoriasis, most commonly tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α antagonists and ustekinumab; however, the IL-17A antagonist secukinumab also has shown efficacy in the treatment of PRP. We report 2 new cases of severe refractory PRP that responded rapidly to treatment with secukinumab.

Practice Points

  • In patients with pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) who have not responded to topical treatments, off-label treatment with systemic therapies approved for plaque psoriasis can be considered.
  • Secukinumab, an IL-17A antagonist, has shown particularly striking results in the treatment of PRP.


 

References

Although there currently are no formal guidelines for the treatment of refractory pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP), successful off-label treatment of the condition with multiple biologics approved for psoriasis has been reported.1,2 Secukinumab, an IL-17A antagonist, has shown particularly striking results in the treatment of PRP in 2 recent case reports.3,4 We report 2 additional cases of severe refractory PRP that responded rapidly to treatment with secukinumab. In both cases, the patients’ erythematous plaques resolved or had nearly resolved by week 4 of treatment. Our findings suggest that IL-17 plays an important role in PRP pathogenesis and support future clinical trials of anti–IL-17 agents for treatment of this entity.

Case Reports

Patient 1
A 60-year-old man with a history of biopsy-proven PRP presented with persistent generalized erythema, scattered patches of normal skin, and hyperkeratotic plaques on the bilateral palms of 1 year’s duration. Previous therapies included topical steroids, topical calcipotriene, adalimumab 40 mg once every other week, infliximab 5 mg/kg once every 8 weeks, ustekinumab 90 mg once every 12 weeks, acitretin 25 mg once daily, and most recently cyclosporine 200 mg twice daily. Of these treatments, infliximab was the only treatment that provided minimal relief; however, the patient continued to have itching and painful plaques covering approximately 20% of body surface area (Figure 1A). Infliximab was therefore discontinued and treatment with cyclosporine was started. After failure on cyclosporine, the patient was started on secukinumab, with loading doses of 300 mg injected subcutaneously once weekly for 5 weeks.

At 4 weeks’ follow-up, there was a marked decrease in erythema and scaling. The body surface area affected had decreased to 5%, and improvement of palmar keratoderma was noted. The patient continued with maintenance dosing of secukinumab 300 mg once every 4 weeks. By week 8, the erythema had fully resolved (Figure 1B), and he remained clear at week 24. No adverse events were noted since initiation of therapy.

Figure 1. Painful plaques on the chest in Patient 1 at initial presentation (A) and at week 8 of treatment with secukinumab for refractory pityriasis rubra pilaris (B).

Patient 2
A 74-year-old woman with a history of PRP that had previously been misdiagnosed as psoriasis by an outside physician presented for evaluation of palmoplantar keratoderma (Figure 2A), follicular hyperkeratosis, and erythematous plaques on the trunk and arms of 5 years’ duration. Previous therapies included topical steroids, topical urea, methotrexate 20 mg once weekly, adalimumab 40 mg once every other week, infliximab 10 mg/kg once every 4 weeks, ustekinumab 90 mg once every 12 weeks, and most recently acitretin 50 mg once daily.

The patient had been maintained on ustekinumab and acitretin for 2 years with only mild improvement. Ustekinumab was then discontinued, and after 3 months treatment with secukinumab was added to the once-daily acitretin. Similar to Patient 1, loading doses of secukinumab 300 mg were administered once weekly for 5 weeks. The plaques on the trunk and arms had resolved by week 4, but the palmoplantar keratoderma persisted. The patient continued with the maintenance dose of secukinumab 300 mg once every 4 weeks and reported an increase in peeling of the palms and soles at week 8.

Figure 2. Plantar keratoderma in Patient 2 at initial presentation (A) and at week 12 of treatment with secukinumab for refractory pityriasis rubra pilaris (B). Note the considerable improvement of plantar keratoderma.

By week 12 of treatment, the palmar keratoderma had resolved, and debridement of the soles revealed patches of normal skin (Figure 2B). By week 52, no adverse events had been noted. The patient continued to experience mild keratoderma of the soles, making us reluctant to discontinue acitretin; however, she has maintained her maximal response, and her quality of life has significantly improved. The patient was continued on acitretin and secukinumab, and her condition remained stable.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Lenalidomide yields responses in a rare cutaneous lymphoma
MDedge Dermatology
Drug-induced Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis in a Patient With a Vancomycin-impregnated Cement Spacer
MDedge Dermatology
Spontaneous Regression of Merkel Cell Carcinoma
MDedge Dermatology
Chikungunya infection in children masquerades as SJS-TEN
MDedge Dermatology
MDedge Daily News: Which nonopioids are ripe for abuse?
MDedge Dermatology
Colchicine looks promising for treating prurigo pigmentosa in case report
MDedge Dermatology
Intrauterine therapy showed promise in XLHED
MDedge Dermatology
Intralymphatic Histiocytosis Treated With Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide and Pressure Bandage
MDedge Dermatology
Low incidence of HS in children does not diminish importance of early diagnosis
MDedge Dermatology
Perianal Basal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Mohs Micrographic Surgery
MDedge Dermatology