Tofacitinib significantly improved skin lesions associated with cutaneous sarcoidosis, according to a case report published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Treatment options for cutaneous sarcoidosis are limited, as are data on the effectiveness of alternatives to prednisone, which is often the first choice despite adverse effects, wrote William Damsky, MD, of Yale University in New Haven, Conn., and his colleagues.
Previous studies have suggested involvement of the JAK-STAT pathway in sarcoidosis; therefore, the researchers treated a patient who had refractory cutaneous sarcoidosis with oral tofacitinib. The treatment significantly improved the patient’s skin lesions both clinically and histologically.
The patient was a 48-year-old woman with a history of cutaneous and pulmonary sarcoidosis and treatment-resistant skin lesions. At the time of the case report, she had no pulmonary symptoms and no ophthalmologic issues, but presented with pink-brown indurated papules and plaques, and some alopecia on her scalp (N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2540-6).
The patient had not responded to other medications including glucocorticoids, minocycline, hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate, adalimumab, tacrolimus, and apremilast. With her consent, the patient received off-label tofacitinib at 5 mg twice daily. The lesions began to improve, but treatment was discontinued because of insurance issues. When treatment resumed, the patient’s Cutaneous Sarcoidosis Activity and Morphology Instrument (CSAMI) score, used to assess disease activity, was 85 on a scale of 0 to 165; this score dropped to 53 after 4 months of treatment.
In addition, two samples collected after 10 months of treatment showed histologic resolution of granulomas.
Although the findings must be replicated in other patients, the results suggest that “the dysregulation of JAK-STAT–dependent cytokines (e.g., interferon-gamma) is pathogenically involved in cutaneous sarcoidosis and, probably, in sarcoidosis in general,” the researchers said.
Dr. Damsky disclosed a financial relationship with Eli Lilly, and research funding from the Dermatology Foundation and the National Institutes of Health. The study was supported by the Ranjini and Ajay Poddar Resource Fund for Dermatologic Diseases Research, the National Institutes of Health, and the Dermatology Foundation.
SOURCE: Damsky W et al. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2540-6.