From the Journals

Fluorouracil beats other actinic keratosis treatments in head-to-head trial


 

FROM THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

A head-to-head comparison of four commonly used field-directed treatments for actinic keratosis (AK) found that 5% fluorouracil cream was the most effective at reducing the size of lesions.

pedrojperez/Getty Images

In a study published in the March 7 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, researchers reported the outcomes of a multicenter, single-blind trial in 602 patients with five or more AK lesions in one continuous area on the head measuring 25-100 cm2. Patients were randomized to treatment with either 5% fluorouracil cream, 5% imiquimod cream, methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT), or 0.015% ingenol mebutate gel.

Overall, 74.7% of patients who received fluorouracil cream achieved treatment success – defined as at least a 75% reduction in lesion size at 12 months after the end of treatment – compared with 53.9% of patients treated with imiquimod, 37.7% of those treated with MAL-PDT, and 28.9% of those treated with ingenol mebutate. The differences between fluorouracil and the other treatments was significant.

Maud H.E. Jansen, MD, and Janneke P.H.M. Kessels, MD, of the department of dermatology at Maastricht (the Netherlands) University Medical Center and their coauthors pointed out that, while there was plenty of literature about different AK treatments, there were few head-to-head comparisons and many studies were underpowered or had different outcome measures.

Even when the analysis was restricted to patients with grade I or II lesions, fluorouracil remained the most effective treatment, with 75.3% of patients achieving treatment success, compared with 52.6% with imiquimod, 38.7% with MAL-PDT, and 30.2% with ingenol mebutate.

There were not enough patients with more severe grade III lesions to enable a separate analysis of their outcomes; 49 (7.9%) of patients in the study had at least one grade III lesion.

The authors noted that many previous studies had excluded patients with grade III lesions. “Exclusion of patients with grade III lesions was associated with slightly higher rates of success in the fluorouracil, MAL-PDT, and ingenol mebutate groups than the rates in the unrestricted analysis,” they wrote. The inclusion of patients with grade III AK lesions in this trial made it “more representative of patients seen in daily practice,” they added.

Treatment failure – less than 75% clearance of actinic keratosis at 3 months after the final treatment – was seen after one treatment cycle in 14.8% of patients treated with fluorouracil, 37.2% of patients on imiquimod, 34.6% of patients given photodynamic therapy, and 47.8% of patients on ingenol mebutate therapy.

All these patients were offered a second treatment cycle, but those treated with imiquimod, PDT, and ingenol mebutate were less likely to undergo a second treatment.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Topical 5-Fluorouracil Made Easy?
MDedge Dermatology
Best practices address latest trends in PDT, skin cancer treatment
MDedge Dermatology
VIDEO: Painless PDT and other AK tricks
MDedge Dermatology
Energy-Based Devices for Actinic Keratosis Field Therapy
MDedge Dermatology
Imiquimod-Induced Hypopigmentation Following Treatment of Periungual Verruca Vulgaris
MDedge Dermatology
Products being developed for AKs therapy may appeal to patients
MDedge Dermatology
Will microneedling enhance the impact of photodynamic therapy?
MDedge Dermatology
Case report: Longstanding actinic keratosis responds to kanuka honey
MDedge Dermatology
Fine-tune staging for better SCC risk stratification
MDedge Dermatology
Elephantiasis Nostras Verrucosa Secondary to Scleroderma
MDedge Dermatology