Conference Coverage

Filler complications involving vascular necrosis, vision changes on the rise


 

FROM ASDS 2021

The number of adverse events involving vascular necrosis and vision changes following injection of dermal fillers increased from 2014 to 2020, results from a large database analysis showed.

Michelle Xiong, 4th-year student at the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, R.I.

Michelle Xiong

“The ASDS estimates that 1.6 million soft tissue filler procedures were performed in 2019, a 78% increase from 2012,” presenting author Michelle Xiong, a 4th-year student at Brown University, Providence, R.I., said during a virtual abstract session at the annual meeting of the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery. “The popularity of dermal fillers continues to increase. With that, there is increasing concern of possible associated adverse events. Most concerning are those related to vascular occlusion.”

Dr. Kachiu C. Lee, cosmetic dermatologist, Main Line Center for Laser Surgery, Ardmore, Pa.

Dr. Kachiu C, Lee

Under the supervision of senior author Kachiu C. Lee, MD, MPH, of Main Line Center for Laser Surgery in Ardmore, Pa., Ms. Xiong and colleagues analyzed the Food and Drug Administration’s Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database of medical device–related adverse event reports, to better understand and characterize dermal filler-related complications. They limited the analysis to adverse events involving injectable fillers from January 2014 to December 2020 and determined the number of complications by type per year and reviewed reports to identify injection site locations. Next, they used the binomial test to compare the proportion of complication categories from 2014 through 2016 and from 2017 through 2020.

In all, 5,994 reports were identified during the 7-year study period. To evaluate trends over time, the researchers estimated the rate of complications per 100 reports each year. While the absolute number of reports increased over time, the rate of adverse events per 100 reports decreased, suggesting an overall improvement in safety.

When the researchers focused on complications involving vascular occlusion, they found that vascular necrosis accounted for 3.5% of all complications, compared with vision changes (1.5% of all complications), and stroke (0.3% of all complications). When comparing the years 2014-2016 with 2017-2020, there was a significant increase in adverse events involving vascular necrosis (0.9%; P = .018) and vision changes (0.94%; P = .001), but no significant difference in the number of reports of stroke (-0.1%; P = .409). “This highlights that serious complications like necrosis and vision changes have increased over time,” Ms. Xiong said.

Overall, the three most common injection sites involving necrosis and vision changes were the cheek, the nose, and the nasolabial fold. The cheek was the most common site associated with stroke. “These findings are similar to those of previous studies, further emphasizing that the nose, nasolabial fold, and cheek are possibly challenging injection sites,” she said.

“In general, as the face is a highly vascular area with many anastomoses, it’s especially important to be aware of facial anatomy when injecting. In addition to awareness of anatomy, injection techniques can influence vascular complications. Unfortunately, the event narratives in the MAUDE database did not go into detail about the procedural technique.”

Ms. Xiong said that as the popularity of dermal fillers continues to grow, “it’s important for providers to understand the possible adverse events, both to better counsel patients and to improve safety management. The proportion of serious complications such as vascular necrosis and vision changes have increased from 2014 to 2020. This highlights an increased need for training to better understand facial anatomy and to emphasize practice techniques to minimize risk.”

Dr. Lee acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including that “submission of adverse events to the MAUDE database are not verified or standardized,” she told this news organization.

Dr. Lawrence J. Green, clinical professor of dermatology at George Washington University, Washington, DC

Dr. Lawrence J. Green

“With the ever-increasing popularity of fillers, it is not surprising that the absolute number of complications is rising, but it is also reassuring to see that the overall ratio of complications per hundred reports is down,” said Lawrence J. Green, MD, clinical professor of dermatology at George Washington University, Washington, who was asked to comment on the study. “I would be curious to know what proportion of filler complications are due to non–core practitioners compared to dermatologists and plastic surgeons.”

The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.

Dr. Green disclosed that he is a speaker, consultant, or investigator for numerous pharmaceutical companies.

Recommended Reading

Selective cooling technology being used to remove age spots
MDedge Dermatology
FDA issues stronger safety requirements for breast implants
MDedge Dermatology
Expert shares eye protection tips for cutaneous laser surgery
MDedge Dermatology
What are the legal risks of practicing laser cutaneous surgery?
MDedge Dermatology
Does the use of frankincense make sense in dermatology?
MDedge Dermatology
Striae gravidarum: More than a ‘nuisance,’ say researchers
MDedge Dermatology
Sea buckthorn: What is it and what is it good for?
MDedge Dermatology
Characterizing Counterfeit Dermatologic Devices Sold on Popular E-commerce Websites
MDedge Dermatology
International panel backs energy-based devices as first-line treatment of acne scars
MDedge Dermatology
Review finds microneedling an effective add-on to topical melasma therapies
MDedge Dermatology