A new Medicare program to start next year will take some of the gambleand administrative hasslesout of providing injectable drugs to patients.
The arrangement, known as the Medicare Competitive Acquisition Program for Part B Drugs and Biologicals, "provides an important alternative method of drug acquisition for rheumatologists and other physicians for whom the [current] payment methodology is burdensome and, in some cases, does not cover their acquisition costs for drugs," Joseph Flood, M.D., government affairs committee chair of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), told this newspaper.
Under the current system, physicians purchase the drugs themselves from a distributor or manufacturer and then bill Medicare for reimbursement, which is set at a statutorily mandated payment rate of 106% of the manufacturer's average sales price (or ASP + 6%). Medicare pays 80% of this rate to the physician, and the physician collects a 20% coinsurance payment from the beneficiary.
Given fluctuations in what distributors and manufacturers charge for the drugs, however, in some cases Medicare's reimbursement can fall short of what the drugs actually cost.
Physicians who elect to participate in the competitive acquisition program will obtain drugs from a preselected list of vendors, and these vendors will take on the responsibility of billing Medicare for the drugs and collecting coinsurance or deductibles from patients. At this point, it's not clear how many vendors will be participating in the program, but all will have to meet certain quality, program integrity, financial stability, and service standards.
Once a year, physicians who provide health care for Medicare beneficiaries will have the option of electing to participate in the program and at that point select a vendor to be their primary drug source. All physician participants will continue to submit procedural claims to Medicare for the cost of administering the agents.
Having fewer administrative and financial burdens should free doctors "to focus more on providing treatments for their patients," Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) administrator Mark McClellan, M.D., said in a statement.
Taking physicians out of the drug administration's financial chain should help insulate them from price fluctuations that can occur under the current system, a CMS spokeswoman noted in an interview. While it's true that physicians may miss out on profits if acquisition costs from the supplier are less than the average sales price, physicians can also take a hit if the acquisition costs exceed that price, she explained.
Officials at ACR praised the fact that the competitive acquisition program wasn't created exclusively for oncologists. "All physicians participating in Medicare have the opportunity to participate" in this voluntary program, according to a statement from the law firm Patton Boggs L.L.P., the government affairs representative for the ACR.
Physicians who decide not to participate in the new program may continue to purchase drugs directly from the suppliers. "We support our members' right to choose the method of drug acquisition and payment that makes the most sense for their particular practice," Dr. Flood said.
The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) lobbied for the competitive bidding process to be available for all drugs, "and CMS went pretty far down that road" in order to meet that request, Joseph S. Bailes, M.D., cochair of the government relations council for ASCO, said in an interview.
One drawback of the program is that for vendors and CMS to have enough time to reconcile claims dataand thus for vendors to get paidphysicians have just 14 days to submit to Medicare carriers procedural claims, including all necessary codes, for the administration of the drugs. That quick turnaround time may prove to be too challenging for some rheumatology practices. Individual providers should seriously consider whether they have the staff resources to meet that deadline before enrolling in the program.
Noting that "14 days was too short a period of time" for practices to process the claims, Dr. Bailes said that ASCO and the ACR tried but failed to convince CMS to extend the deadline to 30 business days.
Another possible wrinkle, Dr. Bailes noted, may occur because vendors can elect not to ship a drug if the patient has not met some of the copay obligations. "This could raise a problem," he said.
Drug distributors themselves don't seem comfortable with the idea of collecting deductibles and coinsurance from the beneficiaries. "Distributors typically do not have direct patient contact," Scott Melville, senior vice president of government relations at the Healthcare Distribution Management Association, a trade group representing full-service drug distributors, wrote in comments on the proposed rule to the new bidding process.